Abstract
ABSTRACTImportanceThe Verifying Accurate Leading-edge IVCT Development Act, if enacted, would create a unified regulatory oversight system for all in vitro clinical tests, including laboratory-developed tests.ObjectiveTo determine the frequency of use of laboratory-developed tests in an academic medical center system.DesignQuality improvement study analyzing 2021 test order data.SettingAcademic medical center (hospital, outpatient clinics, and cancer center) and non-profit national reference laboratory.Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Main outcome, not applicable; non-interventional study of retrospective data. Measures include assay type, assay methodology, compliance status (i.e., Food and Drug Administration cleared, approved, and/or authorized assay, laboratory-developed test, and standard method), test order volume, inpatient versus outpatient setting, and provider medical specialty.ResultsOf the 3,016,928 tests ordered in 2021, 2,831,489 (93.9%) were Food and Drug Administration cleared, approved, and/or authorized assays, 116,583 (3.9%) were laboratory-developed tests, and 68,856 (2.3%) were standard methods. Laboratory-developed tests were more commonly ordered in the outpatient versus inpatient setting and represented a higher proportion of the test volume at the cancer center compared to University Hospital (5.6% vs 3.6% respectively). The top 167 laboratory-developed test assays accounted for 90% of the laboratory-developed test volume (104,996 orders). Among the 20 most frequently ordered laboratory-developed tests were mass spectrometry assays and tests used in the care of immunocompromised patients. Internal/family medicine placed the greatest number of orders (1,044,642) and ordered one of the lowest proportions of laboratory-developed tests (3.2%). Non-infectious disease molecular testing made up 8.8% of laboratory-developed tests ordered.ConclusionsLaboratory-developed tests made up a small percentage of the total laboratory tests ordered within the academic health system studied. Regulatory reform proposals should consider the need for both safety and availability of laboratory-developed tests in clinical laboratory settings.KEY POINTSQuestionHow frequently are laboratory developed tests (LDTs) used in an academic medical center (AMC) setting?FindingsIn this quality improvement study looking at test orders in 2021, 93.9% of test orders were for FDA cleared, approved, or authorized assays, 3.9% were for LDTs, and 2.3% were for standard methods. The top 167 LDT assays accounted for 90% of the LTD volume.MeaningIn vitro diagnostic reform efforts will impact many LDTs assays with relatively low order volumes in AMC settings.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference33 articles.
1. Gutierrez A. Oversight of laboratory developed tests. Association of Public Health Laboratories annual meeting, May 2015. (https://www.aphl.org/conferences/proceedings/Documents/2015/Annual-Meeting/70Gutierrez.pdf.)
2. Draft guidance for industry, Food and Drug Administration staff, and clinical laboratories. Framework for regulatory oversight of laboratory developed tests (LDTs). Rockford, MD : Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, October 2014.
3. Oversight of laboratory developed tests. Public meeting. Request for comments. Food and Drug Administration. June 17, 2010. 75 Fed. Reg. 34463.
4. Burton, TM. FDA backs off plans to issue rules governing lab-developed tests. Wall Street Journal. November 18, 2016.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献