Abstract
AbstractBackgroundIn many developed countries, the scope of community pharmacy services has extended to deliver more advanced applications. Unlike the traditional practice focusing on pharmaceutical sales, extended community pharmacy services (ECPSs) are patient-centred, typically offered by specialised healthcare centres, which improve public health, reduce pressure imposed on healthcare professionals and rationalise the health system expenditure. However, several studies have revealed that community pharmacies (CPs) provide only marginalised services. Therefore, a public review is crucial for effectively utilising such healthcare-complementary professional services. This study explores CPs utilisation among the Saudi public in terms of knowledge, attitudes, and barriers towards ECPSs.Materials and MethodsA cross-sectional web-based survey of a non-probability sample was conducted between October and December 2021. Numerical and graphical descriptive statistics were employed with an additional analytical assessment using binary logistic regression for the association between characteristics of participants and barriers to utilising ECPSs.ResultsA total of 563 subjects participated, of which about 33% considered CPs the first place to visit if they have medication concerns. Most were unfamiliar with medication therapy management and health screening services (77%%, and 68%, respectively). Pharmacy clinics for receiving private counselling and electronic patients’ medical records were unknown facilities to them (79% and 63%, respectively). A substantial portion considered the lack of privacy (58%) and inadequate communication with the community pharmacists (56%) as key barriers. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the underdeveloped infrastructure of CPs was significantly associated with almost all factors. Privacy issues concerned females, highly educated and high-income individuals, and those with health insurance. In addition, low socio-economic status, subjects with special needs or chronic diseases, non-health insured and smokers were less likely to utilise the ECPSs due to economic reasons.ConclusionsThe most public was under-utilised services and facilities. Positive attitudes were associated with public concerns regarding their privacy and the cost of services. In line with the Saudi vision 2030, supporting CPs and increasing public awareness towards ECPSs will have significant public health implications.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference50 articles.
1. Almarsdóttir AB , Granas AG , Blondal AB . Clinical and Social Perspectives on Pharmacy Services. In: Thomas D , editor. Clinical Pharmacy Education, Practice and Research: Elsevier; 2019. p. 31–40.
2. Solidarity or dissonance? A systematic review of pharmacist and GP views on community pharmacy services in the UK;Health Soc Care Community,2019
3. Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee. Essential Services. 2013 July 10 [cited 24 October 2022]. In: PSNC website. UK. Available from: https://psnc.org.uk/national-pharmacy-services/essential-services/
4. Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee. Advanced Services. 2013 July 10 [cited 24 october 2022]. In: PSNC website. UK. Available from: https://psnc.org.uk/national-pharmacy-services/advanced-services/
5. Enhanced pharmacy services, barriers and facilitators in Australia’s community pharmacies: Australia’s National Pharmacy Database Project;International Journal of Pharmacy Practice,2007