Changing patterns of cigarette and ENDS transitions in the US: a multistate transition analysis of youth and adults in the PATH Study in 2015–17 vs 2017–2019

Author:

Brouwer Andrew F.ORCID,Jeon JihyounORCID,Jimenez-Mendoza EvelynORCID,Land Stephanie R.ORCID,Holford Theodore R.,Friedman Abigail S.,Tam JamieORCID,Mistry RiteshORCID,Levy David T.,Meza RafaelORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionIt is unknown how recent changes in the tobacco product marketplace have impacted transitions in cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use.MethodsA multistate transition model was applied to 24,242 adults and 12,067 youth in Waves 2–4 (2015–2017) and 28,061 adults and 12,538 youth in Waves 4–5 (2017–2019) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Hazards for initiation, cessation, and product transitions were estimated in multivariable models, accounting for gender, age group, race/ethnicity, and daily vs non-daily product use.ResultsChanges in ENDS initiation/relapse rates from never, non-current, and cigarette-only use depended on age group, including among adults. Among youth never users, the 1-year probability of ENDS initiation increased after 2017 from 1.6% (95%CI: 1.4-1.8%) to 3.8% (95%CI: 3.4-4.2). Persistence of ENDS-only use (1-year probability of remaining an ENDS-only user) increased for youth from 40.7% (95%CI: 34.4-46.9%) to 65.7% (95%CI: 60.5-71.1%) and for adults from 57.8% (95%CI: 54.4-61.3%) to 78.2% (95%CI: 76.080.4%). Persistence of dual use similarly increased for youth from 48.3% (95%CI: 37.4-59.2%) to 60.9% (95%CI: 43.0-78.8%) and for adults from 40.1% (95%CI: 37.0-43.2%) to 63.8% (95%CI: 59.6-67.6%). Youth and young adult dual users became more likely to transition to ENDS-only use but middle-aged and older adults did not.ConclusionsENDS and dual use have become more persistent. Middle-aged and older adult dual users have become less likely to transition to cigarette-only use but not more likely to discontinue cigarettes. Youth and young adults are more likely to transition to ENDS-only use.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3