Abstract
AbstractThe pressure on healthcare is increasing worldwide. The trend toward digitalization in recent decades and the emergence of modern technologies have enabled remote treatment and offered patients new ways to interact with physicians. Despite numerous studies showing promising results in the use of video calls for primary care consultations, some survey studies report lingering doubts about the effectiveness of this method among general practitioners (GPs) and patients. Because the organization of health care varies widely across countries, we set out to investigate the appropriateness of video calling in a Dutch health care setting. Unlike many survey studies, we collected real-life data where GPs evaluated the video call directly after the consultation, allowing a more realistic assessment of perceived quality. We find that video calls are appropriate 84.2% (95% CI 80.3%-87.8%) of the time for consultations with patients of moderate to low urgency. Importantly, the appropriateness of video calls decreased with increasing urgency. These results build on previous studies and confirm the positive use cases of video calls focused on primary care in the Netherlands.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference26 articles.
1. Use of a voice and video internet technology as an alternative to in-person urgent care clinic visits
2. Telemedicine Versus Telephone for Remote Emergency Stroke Consultations
3. Cardol, M. , van Dijk, L. , de Jong, J. D. , de Bakker, D. H. , & Westert, G. P. (2004). Tweede nationale studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk.
4. Carrillo de Albornoz, S. , Sia, K.-L. , & Harris, A. (2021). The effectiveness of teleconsultations in primary care: systematic review. Family Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab077
5. Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries