Is apparent digestibility associated with residual feed intake and enteric methane emission in Nellore cattle?

Author:

Gianvecchio Sarah Bernardes,Sakamoto Leandro Sannomiya,Souza Luana Lelis,Benfica Lorena Ferreira,de Oliveira Santos Marcatto Juliana,de Paula Eduardo Marostegan,Canesin Roberta Carilho,dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo Joslaine,Albuquerque Lucia Galvão,Mercadante Maria Eugênia ZerlottiORCID

Abstract

AbstractResidual feed intake (RFI) detects animals that consume less dry matter (DM) adjusted for production and maintenance, and differences in the digestibility may explain differences in RFI among contemporaneous cattle. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between digestibility, RFI, and enteric methane emission in growing Nellore cattle (Bos indicus) divergently classified based on RFI phenotypes and also on RFI breeding value. One hundred twenty-two Nellore cattle submitted to performance testing in two test groups (249±4.33 days of age, and 332±4.22 days of age at the beginning of the test) were classified based on residual feed intake (RFI). A sample of 80 animals classified as low RFI (−0.748±0.076 kg DM/day) or high RFI (0.775±0.075 kg DM/day) was evaluated regarding feed compounds digestibility, fecal excretion, and enteric methane (CH4, g/day) emission. There was no significant difference in feed compounds digestibility between the most and least efficient animals. However, DM intake (6.92 vs. 8.66 kg DM/day) and feed conversion (7.93 vs. 9.42 kg/kg) were lower in low RFI animals. On average, low RFI animals emitted 14.3 g less CH4per day (174 vs. 188 g CH4/day; P=0.02); however, CH4emission expressed as g/kg DM intake (23.1 vs. 20.1; P<0.01) and the percentage of gross energy intake lost as CH4(8.13 vs. 7.08%; P<0.01) were higher in these animals. There are clear benefits (economic and environmental) of using more feed efficient animals in the beef production chain, i.e., animals that exhibit lower feed intake, lower fecal excretion and lower enteric methane emission without differences in weight gain or body weight. Variations in feed efficiency among them cannot be explained by differences in DM or feed compounds digestibility. More efficient animals emit less enteric methane (CH4, g/day) than less efficient animals, probably as a result of lower DMI.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3