To test or not? Xpert MTB/RIF as an alternative to smear microscopy to guide line probe assay testing for drug-resistant tuberculosis

Author:

Pillay S,de Vos M,Sohn H,Ghebrekristos Y,Dolby T,Warren RM,Theron G

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) revolutionised tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis, however, laboratory decision making on whether widely-used reflex drug susceptibility assays (MTBDRplus, MTBDRsl) are done on specimens is often based on smear microscopy status.MethodWe performed receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses using sputum bacterial load measures [smear microscopy grade, Xpert semi-quantitation category and minimum cycle threshold (CTmin) values] for the classification of “likely non-actionable” (not resistant or susceptible) line probe assays results. We evaluated the actionable-to-non-actionable result ratio and pay-offs with missed isoniazid and fluoroquinolone resistance compared to if LPAs were done universally.FindingsSmear-negatives were more likely than smear-positives to generate a non-actionable MTBDRplus[23% (133/559) vs. 4% (15/381)] or MTBDRsl[39% (220/559) vs. 12% (47/381)] result, however, excluding smear-negatives would result in missed rapid diagnoses [e.g., only 51% (273/537) of LPA-diagnosable isoniazid resistance detected if smear-negatives omitted]. Within smear-negatives, testing ≥ “medium” specimens had a high ratio of actionable-to-non-actionable results (12.8 or a 4-fold improvement vs. test all for MTBDRplus, 4.5 or 3-fold improvement for MTBDRsl), which would capture 64% (168/264) and 77% (34/44) of LPA-detectable resistance. If CTminwere used, greater resolution and higher ratios offset against fewer missed resistant cases were obtained.ConclusionRoutinely-generated Xpert quantitative information permits identification of smear-negatives in whom the ratio of actionable-to-non-actionable LPA results may prove acceptably high to laboratories depending on their local contexts. Xpert CTminor, if unavailable, semiquantitation category should be used to guide reflex DST; permitting the rational expansion of direct DST to certain paucibacillary specimens.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3