Estimating home range and temporal space use variability reveals age-related differences in risk exposure for reintroduced parrots
Author:
Forrest SWORCID, Rodríguez-Recio MORCID, Seddon PJORCID
Abstract
AbstractIndividual-level differences in animal spatial behaviour have been identified in numerous species, which can lead to differential exposure to risk for different groups, particularly for reintroduced species in fragmented landscapes. To assess the risk-exposure of a population of kākā (Nestor meridionalis) reintroduced into a fenced reserve, we GPS-tracked 10 individuals and estimated their home ranges and temporal space use variability (SUV). We compared home range area (within 95% contour of utilisation distribution - UD95) between individuals in relation to age, sex, and fledging origin, and assessed risk exposure by calculating the proportion of each individual’s home range beyond the reserve’s fence. To estimate temporal variability within each individual’s space use, we used a sweeping window framework to estimate occurrence distributions of temporally overlapping snapshots of the movement trajectory. For each occurrence distribution, we calculated the proportion outside the reserve’s fence to assess how risk exposure changed throughout time, and the UD95 area and UD95 centroid to assess the behavioural pattern of space use. Home range area declined significantly and consistently with age (up to 27-fold differences), and the space use of juvenile kākā was more temporally dynamic, particularly in relation to drift of the UD95 centroid. The wider-ranging behaviour of younger kākā resulted in more time spent outside the reserve, which aligned with a higher number of incidental mortality observations of younger individuals. Quantifying both the home range and space use variability of populations that may encounter spatially dependent threats is an effective approach to assess risk exposure, which can provide guidance for management interventions. We also emphasise the temporal space use variability approach, which is a flexible approach that can provide numerous insights and has not been widely adopted in the literature. We provide code and data such that all the analyses in this study can be reproduced.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference53 articles.
1. Intake of sugar water by kākā in Ōrokonui Ecosanctuary;N. Z. J. Ecol,2021 2. Alston, J. M. , Fleming, C. H. , Noonan, M. J. , Tucker, M. A. , Silva, I. , Folta, C. , Akre, T. S. B. , Ali, A. H. , Belant, J. L. , Beyer, D. , Blaum, N. , Böhning-Gaese, K. , de Paula, R. C. , Dekker, J. , Drescher-Lehman, J. , Farwig, N. , Fichtel, C. , Fischer, C. , Ford, A. T. , Janssen, R. , Jeltsch, F. , Kappeler, P. M. , LaPoint, S. D. , Catherine Markham, A. , Patricia Medici, E. , Morato, R. G. , Nathan, R. , Olson, K. A. , Patterson, B. D. , Petroelje, T. R. , Ramalho, E. E. , Rösner, S. , Santos, L. G. O. , Schabo, D. G. , Selva, N. , Sergiel, A. , Spiegel, O. , Ullmann, W. , Zieba, F. , Zwijacz-Kozica, T. , Wittemyer, G. , Fagan, W. F. , Müller, T. , & Calabrese, J. M. (2022, September 30). Clarifying space use concepts in ecology: range vs. occurrence distributions. bioRxiv. 3. Andreassen, H. P. , Stenseth, N. C. , & Ims, R. A. (2002). Dispersal behaviour and population dynamics of vertebrates. In R. Bullock James , E. Kenward Robert , & S. Hailis Rosie (Eds.), Dispersal Ecology. pp. 238–240. Blackwell Science. 4. Bartoń, K. (2020). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. 5. Energetics of South Island kaka (Nestor meridionalis meridionalis) feeding on the larvae of kanuka longhorn beetles (Ochrocydus huttoni);N. Z. J. Ecol,1987
|
|