Novel synergies and isolate specificities in the drug interactions landscape ofMycobacterium abscessus

Author:

Van Nhi,Degefu Yonatan N.,Leus Pathricia A.,Larkins-Ford JonahORCID,Klickstein Jacob,Maurer Florian P.,Stone David,Poonawala Husain,Thorpe Cheleste M.,Smith Trever C.,Aldridge Bree B.ORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTMycobacterium abscessusinfections are difficult to treat and are often considered untreatable without tissue resection. Due to the intrinsic drug-resistant nature of the bacteria, combination therapy of three or more antibiotics is recommended. A major challenge in treatingM. abscessusinfections is the absence of a universal combination therapy with satisfying clinical success rates, leaving clinicians to treat infections using antibiotic lacking efficacy data. We systematically measured drug combinations inM. abscessusto establish a resource of drug interaction data and identify patterns of synergy to help design optimized combination therapies. We measured approximately 230 pairwise drug interactions among 22 antibiotics and identified 71 synergistic pairs, 54 antagonistic pairs, and four potentiator-antibiotics not previously reported. We found that commonly used drug combinations in the clinic, such as azithromycin and amikacin, are antagonistic in lab reference strain ATCC19977, whereas novel combinations, such as azithromycin and rifampicin, are synergistic. Another challenge in developing universally effective multidrug therapies forM. abscessusis the significant variation in drug response between isolates. We measured drug interactions in a focused set of 36 drug pairs across a small panel of clinical isolates with rough and smooth morphotypes. We observed highly strain-dependent drug interactions that cannot be predicted from single-drug susceptibility profiles or known drug mechanisms of action. Our study demonstrates the immense potential to identify synergistic drug combinations in the vast drug combination space and emphasizes the importance of strain-specific combination measurements for designing improved therapeutic interventions.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3