Author:
Koizumi Ai,Hori Tomoki,Maniscalco Brian,Hayase Makoto,Mishima Ryou,Kawashima Takahiko,Miyata Jun,Aso Toshihiko,Lau Hakwan,Takahashi Hidehiko,Amano Kaoru
Abstract
AbstractAlthough altered early stages of visual processing have been reported among schizophrenia patients, how such atypical visual processing may affect higher-level cognition remains largely unknown. Here we tested the hypothesis that metacognitive performance may be atypically modulated by spatial frequency (SF) of visual stimuli among individuals with schizophrenia, given their altered magnocellular function. To study the effect of SF on metacognitive performance, we asked patients and controls to perform a visual detection task on gratings with different SFs and report confidence, and analyzed the data using the signal detection theoretic measure meta-d’. Control subjects showed better metacognitive performance after yes- (stimulus-presence) than after no- (stimulus-absence) responses (‘yes-response advantage’) for high SF (HSF) stimuli but not for low SF (LSF) stimuli. The patients, to the contrary, showed a ‘yes-response advantage’ not only for HSF but also for LSF stimuli, indicating atypical SF dependency of metacognition. An fMRI experiment using the same task revealed that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), known to be crucial for metacognition, shows activity mirroring the behavioral results: decoding accuracy of perceptual confidence in DLPFC was significantly higher for HSF than for LSF stimuli in controls, whereas this decoding accuracy was independent of SF in patients. While individuals without schizophrenia may flexibly adapt metacognitive computations across SF ranges, patients may employ a different mechanism that is independent of SF. Because visual stimuli of low SF have been linked to top-down processing in predictive coding, this may reflect atypical functioning in these processes in schizophrenia.HighlightsVisual metacognition of controls was dependent on spatial frequency.Visual metacognition of schizophrenia patients was independent of spatial frequency.Patients and controls differently rely on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.Sensory inputs may reach metacognitive circuits in an atypical manner among patients.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory