National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020

Author:

Brummell ZORCID,Braun D,Hussein Z,Moonesinghe SRORCID,Vindrola-Padros CORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionRegulation through statutory reporting is used in healthcare internationally to improve accountability, quality of care and patient safety. Since 2017 within the National Health Service (NHS) in England NHS Secondary Care Trusts (NSCTs) are legally required to report annually both quantitative and qualitative information related to patient deaths within their care within their publicly available Quality Accounts as part of a countrywide patient safety programme: The Learning from Deaths (LfDs) programme.MethodAll LfDs reports published between 2017 (programme inception) and 2020 were reviewed and evaluated through a critical realist lens, quantitatively reported using descriptive statistics and qualitatively using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsIn 2017/18 44% of NSCTs reported all six statutory elements of the LfDs reporting regulations, in 2019/20 35% of NSCTs were reporting this information. A small number of NSCTs did not report any parts of the LfDs regulatory requirements between 2017 and 2020. Multiple qualitative themes arose from this study suggesting problematic engagement with the LfDs programme, erroneous reporting accuracy and written communication.ConclusionsThe LfDs programme has to some extent reduced variation and improved consistency to the way that NSCTs identify, report and investigate deaths. However, three years into the LfDs programme the majority of NSCTs are not reporting as required by law. This makes the validity of National statutory reporting in Quality accounts within the NHS in England questionable as a regulatory process.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference42 articles.

1. Australian Commission on safety and quality in Healthcare. Developing a safety and quality framework for Australia 2010. Available: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Developing-a-Safety-and-Quality-Framework-for-Australia.pdf

2. Schweppenstedde D et al. Regulating quality and safety of health and social care: International experiences. RAND 2014. Available: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR500/RR561/RAND_RR561.pdf

3. Leatherman S , Sutherland K. The quest for quality: Refining the NHS reforms. The Nuffield Trust 2008. Available: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2017-01/quest-for-quality-briefing-web-final.pdf

4. The impact of Public Reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis;BMC Health Services Research,2016

5. UK Legislation. Health Act 2009. Available: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/21/section/8

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3