Optimization and comparison of two methods for spike train estimation in an unfused tetanic contraction of low threshold motor units

Author:

Rohlén RobinORCID,Antfolk Christian,Grönlund ChristerORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHuman movement is generated by activating motor units (MUs), i.e., the smallest structures that can be voluntarily controlled. Recent findings have shown imaging of voluntarily activated MUs using ultrafast ultrasound based on displacement velocity images and a decomposition algorithm. Given this, estimates of trains of twitches (unfused tetanic signals) evoked by the neural discharges (spikes) of spinal motor neurons are provided. Based on these signals, a band-pass filter method (BPM) has been used to estimate its spike train. In addition, an improved spike estimation method consisting of a continuous Haar wavelet transform method (HWM) has been suggested. However, the parameters of the two methods have not been optimized, and their performance has not been compared rigorously.MethodHWM and BPM were optimized using simulations. Their performance was evaluated based on simulations and two experimental datasets with 21 unfused tetanic contractions considering their rate of agreement, spike offset, and spike offset variability with respect to the simulated or experimental spikes.ResultsA range of parameter sets that resulted in the highest possible agreement with simulated spikes was provided. Both methods highly agreed with simulated and experimental spikes, but HWM was a better spike estimation method than BPM because it had a higher agreement, less bias, and less variation (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe optimized HWM will be an important contributor to further developing the identification and analysis of MUs using imaging, providing indirect access to the neural drive of the spinal cord to the muscle by the unfused tetanic signals.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3