Author:
Mahon Michael B.,Sack Alexandra,Aleuy O. Alejandro,Barbera Carly,Brown Ethan,Buelow Heather,Civitello David J.,Cohen Jeremy M.,de Wit Luz,Forstchen Meghan,Halliday Fletcher W.,Heffernan Patrick,Knutie Sarah A.,Korotasz Alexis,Larson Joanna G.,Rumschlag Samantha L.,Selland Emily,Shepack Alexander,Vincent Nitin,Rohr Jason R.
Abstract
AbstractAnthropogenic change is contributing to the rise in emerging infectious diseases, but it remains unclear which global change drivers most increase disease and under what contexts. We amassed a dataset from the literature that includes 1,832 observations of infectious disease responses to global change drivers across 1,202 host-parasite combinations. We found that biodiversity loss, climate change, and introduced species were associated with increases in disease-related endpoints or harm (i.e., enemy release for introduced species), whereas urbanization was associated with decreases in disease endpoints. Natural biodiversity gradients, deforestation, forest fragmentation, and most classes of chemical contaminants had non-significant effects on these endpoints. Overall, these results were consistent across human and non-human diseases. Context-dependent effects of the global change drivers on disease were common and are discussed. These findings will help better target disease management and surveillance efforts towards global change drivers that increase disease.One-Sentence SummaryHere we quantify which global change drivers increase infectious diseases the most to better target global disease management and surveillance efforts.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献