Clinical practice competencies for standard critical care nursing: Consensus statement based on a systematic review and Delphi survey

Author:

Sakuramoto HideakiORCID,Kuribara Tomoki,Ouchi AkiraORCID,Haruna JunpeiORCID,Unoki TakeshiORCID, ,

Abstract

AbstractClinical practice competencies in standard critical care nursing (SCCN) are necessary to improve the quality of care and patient outcomes. Competency enables definition and provides a framework for the evaluation of actual knowledge, skills, and abilities. However, a clear development process and scientifically validated competencies have not yet been developed in Japan. Thus, this study aimed to develop a consensus-based set of SCCN competencies to cover a framework for critical care nursing education, training, and evaluation. A consensus-based set of SCCN competencies was developed in four stages: (1) development of an initial set of SCCN competencies derived from a systematic review; (2) focus group interviews via video conference to supplement and content expert validation based on initial competencies made from a systematic review; (3) a three-round web-based Delphi survey of health professionals to prioritize and gain consensus on the most essential SCCN competencies; and (4) external validation, feedback, and endorsement from critical care experts. A systematic review of 23 studies and reports identified 685 unique competencies. Of the 239 participants representing a range of health professionals (physicians, nurses, and physical therapists) who registered, 218 (91.2% of registered professionals), 209 (98.9% of round 1 participants), and 201 (96.2% of round two participants) participants responded in round one, round two, and round three of the Delphi survey, respectively. The withdrawal rates between enrollment and each round were less than 10%. After three rounds of the Delphi survey and external validation by experts, the final set of competencies was classified into 6 domains, 26 subdomains, 99 elements, and 525 performance indicators. In summary, a consensus-based, contemporary set of SCCN competencies was identified to cover a framework for critical care nursing education, training, and evaluation.Trial registrationNone

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3