Abstract
AbstractBackgroundIn England and Wales, cryptosporidiosis cases peak in spring and autumn, usually associated with zoonotic and environmental exposures (Cryptosporidium parvum, spring/autumn) and with overseas travel and water-based activities (Cryptosporidium hominis, autumn). Restrictions to control the COVID-19 pandemic prevented social mixing and access to swimming pools and restaurants for many months. Foreign travel from the UK also reduced by 74% in 2020. However, these restrictions potentially increased environmental exposures as people sought alternative countryside activities locally. To inform and strengthen surveillance programmes, we investigated the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on the epidemiology ofC. hominis and C. parvumcases.MethodsCryptosporidium-positive stools, with case demographic data, are referred routinely for genotyping to the national Cryptosporidium Reference Unit (CRU). Cases were extracted from the CRU database (01 January 2015 to 31 December 2021). We defined two periods for pre- and post-COVID-19 restrictions implementation corresponding to the first UK-wide lockdown on 23 March 2020: “pre-restrictions” between week 1, 2015 and week 12, 2020, and “post restrictions-implementation” between week 13, 2020 and week 52, 2021. We conducted an interrupted time-series analysis, assessing differences inC. parvumandC. hominisincidence, trends and periodicity between these periods using negative binomial regression with linear-splines and interactions.ResultsThere were 21,304 cases between 01 January 2015 and 31 December 2021 (C. parvum= 12,246;C. hominis= 9,058). Post restrictions-implementation incidence ofC. hominisdropped by 97.5% (95%CI: 95.4%-98.6%; p<0.001). The decreasing incidence-trend observed pre-restrictions (IRR=0.9976; 95%CI: 0.9969-0.9982; p<0.001) was not observed post restrictions-implementation (IRR=1.0081; 95%CI: 0.9978-1.0186; p=0.128) due to lack of cases. No periodicity change was observed post restrictions-implementation. Where recorded, 22% ofC. hominiscases had travelled abroad. There was also a strong social gradient, with those who lived in deprived areas experiencing a higher proportion of cases. This gradient did not exist post restrictions-implementation, but the effect was exacerbated for the most deprived: 27.2% of cases from the most deprived decile compared to 12.7% in the pre-restrictions period. ForC. parvum, post restrictions-implementation incidence fell by 49.0% (95%CI: 38.4%-58.3%; p<0.001). There was no pre-restrictions incidence-trend (IRR=1.0003; 95%CI: 0.9997-1.0009; p=0.322) but a slight increasing incidence-trend existed post restrictions-implementation (IRR=1.0071; 95%CI: 1.0038-1.0104; p<0.001). A periodicity change was observed forC. parvumpost restrictions-implementation, peaking one week earlier in spring and two weeks later in autumn. Where recorded, 8% ofC. parvumcases had travelled abroad. The social gradient observed forC. parvumwas inverse to that forC. hominis, and was stable pre-restrictions and post restrictions-implementation.ConclusionC. hominiscases were almost entirely arrested post restrictions-implementation, reinforcing that foreign travel is a major driver of seeding infections. Increased hand-hygiene, reduced social mixing, limited access to swimming pools and limited foreign travel affected incidence of most gastrointestinal (GI) pathogens, includingCryptosporidium, in the same period.C. parvumincidence fell sharply but recovered throughout the post restrictions-implementation period, back to pre-restrictions levels by the end of 2021; this is consistent with relaxation of restrictions, reduced compliance and increased countryside use. The effect on our results of changes in health-seeking behaviours, healthcare access and diagnostic laboratory practices post restrictions-implementation is uncertain, but it is likely that access to GPs and specimen referral rate to CRU decreased. Future exceedance reporting forC. hominisshould exclude the post restrictions-implementation period but retain it forC. parvum(except the first six weeks post restrictions-implementation where the incidence fell sharply). Advice on infection prevention and control should be improved for people with GI symptoms, including returning travellers, to ensure hand hygiene and appropriate swimming pool avoidance.Data summaryCryptosporidiumis a notifiable agent in the UK which diagnostic laboratories must report to local health protection teams. Submission ofCryptosporidium-positive stools to the CRU is voluntary, but allows characterisation of the species. We used these data, where the specimen originated from English and Welsh diagnostic laboratories, to describe the epidemiology ofCryptosporidiumspp. between 2015 and 2021.Impact statementCryptosporidiuminfections in industrialised countries can cause serious disease and lead to complicated and lasting sequelae, especially in the immunocompromised. Even in the general population, as well as long term gastrointestinal upset, joint pain, headache and eye pain have also been identified more frequently following cryptosporidiosis (1). There is an established association between cryptosporidiosis and colorectal cancer, although no conclusive evidence regarding causality in either direction (2–5). There has never been such a dramatic reduction in international travel in the modern era than during the COVID-19 pandemic, which is a key driver ofC. hominisinfections. Conversely, pressure on outdoor amenities has rarely been higher, which posed an increase in the likelihood of infection and cross-contamination forC. parvuminfections. There have been few time-series analyses of cryptosporidiosis; in order to inform and strengthen surveillance programmes, we aimed to assess if there was a significant change to the epidemiology ofC. parvumandC. hominisduring the COVID-19 pandemic.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory