Author:
Virdee Pradeep S.,Bankhead Clare,Koshiaris Constantinos,Drakesmith Cynthia Wright,Oke Jason,Withrow Diana,Swain Subhashisa,Collins Kiana,Chammas Lara,Tamm Andres,Zhu Tingting,Morris Eva,Holt Tim,Birks Jacqueline,Perera Rafael,Hobbs FD Richard,Nicholson Brian D.
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundSimple blood tests can play an important role in identifying patients for cancer investigation. The current evidence base is limited almost entirely to tests used in isolation. However, recent evidence suggests combining multiple types of blood tests and investigating trends in blood test results over time could be more useful to select patients for further cancer investigation. Such trends could increase cancer yield and reduce unnecessary referrals. We aim to explore whether trends in blood test results are more useful than symptoms or single blood test results in selecting primary care patients for cancer investigation. We aim to develop clinical prediction models that incorporate trends in blood tests to identify risk of cancer.MethodsPrimary care electronic health records data from the English Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum primary care database will be accessed and linked to cancer registrations and secondary care datasets. Using a cohort study design, we will describe patterns in blood testing (Aim 1) and explore associations between covariates and trends in blood tests with cancer using mixed-effects, Cox, and joint models (Aim 2). To build the predictive models for risk of cancer, we will use multivariate joint modelling and machine-learning, incorporating simultaneous trends in multiple blood tests, together with other covariates (Aim 3). Model performance will be assessed using various performance measures, including c-statistic and calibration plots.DiscussionThese models will form decision rules to help general practitioners find patients who need referral for further investigation of cancer. This could increase cancer yield, reduce unnecessary referrals, and give more patients the opportunity for treatment and improved outcomes.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献