Evaluation of S/F94 as a proxy for COVID-19 severity

Author:

Swets Maaike CORCID,Kerr StevenORCID,Scott-Brown JamesORCID,Brown Adam B,Gupta RishiORCID,Millar Jonathan E,Spata EntiORCID,McCurrach Fiona,Bretherick Andrew DORCID,Docherty AnnemarieORCID,Harrison David,Rowan Kathy,Young Neil,Groeneveld Geert H,Dunning JakeORCID,Nguyen-Van-Tam Jonathan SORCID,Openshaw PeterORCID,Horby Peter W.ORCID,Harrison EwenORCID,Staplin NatalieORCID,Semple Malcolm GORCID,Lone Nazir,Baillie J KennethORCID,

Abstract

AbstractOptimising statistical power in early-stage trials and observational studies accelerates discovery and improves the reliability of results. Ideally, intermediate outcomes should be continuously distributed and lie on the causal pathway between an intervention and a definitive outcome such as mortality. In order to optimise power for an intermediate outcome in the RECOVERY trial, we devised and evaluated a modification to a simple, pragmatic measure of oxygenation function - the SaO2/FIO2 (S/F) ratio.We demonstrate that, because of the ceiling effect in oxyhaemoglobin saturation, S/F ceases to reflect pulmonary oxygenation function at high values of SaO2. Using synthetic and real data, we found that the correlation of S/F with a gold standard (PaO2/FIO2, P/F ratio) improved substantially when measurements with SaO2 ≥ 0.94 are excluded (Spearman r, synthetic data: S/F : 0.31; S/F94: 0.85). We refer to this measure as S/F94.In order to test the underlying assumptions and validity of S/F94 as a predictor of a definitive outcome (mortality), we collected an observational dataset including over 39,000 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in the ISARIC4C study. We first demonstrated that S/F94 is predictive of mortality in COVID-19. We then compared the sample sizes required for trials using different outcome measures (S/F94, the WHO ordinal scale, sustained improvement at day 28 and mortality at day 28) ensuring comparable effect sizes. The smallest sample size was needed when S/F94 on day 5 was used as an outcome measure.To facilitate future study design, we provide an online user interface to quantify real-world power for a range of outcomes and inclusion criteria, using a synthetic dataset retaining the population-level clinical associations in real data accrued in ISARIC4C https://isaric4c.net/endpoints.We demonstrated that S/F94 is superior to S/F as a measure of pulmonary oxygenation function and is an effective intermediate outcome measure in COVID-19. It is a simple and non-invasive measurement, representative of disease severity and provides greater statistical power to detect treatment differences than other intermediate endpoints.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference22 articles.

1. Drugs, F. C.-. D. & for Treatment or Prevention Guidance for Industry, B. P. 18 (2020).

2. Group on the clinical characterisation and management of covid-19 infection;A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-,2020

3. Endpoints for randomized controlled clinical trials for covid-19 treatments;Clinical trials (London, England),2020

4. Effect of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with covid-19;The New England journal of medicine,2020

5. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 — Final Report

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3