Abstract
AbstractUrbanisation is increasing at a phenomenal rate across the globe, transforming landscapes, presenting organisms with novel challenges, shaping phenotypic traits, and even impacting fitness. Among colour traits, urban individuals are widely claimed to have duller tones in carotenoid-based traits, the so-called “urban dullness” phenomenon. However, at the intra-specific level, this generalisation is surprisingly inconsistent and often based on examples from single urban/non-urban population pairs or a limited geographic area. Here, combining correlational, experimental, and meta-analytical results from a common songbird, the great tit (Parus major), we investigated carotenoid-based plumage coloration in urban and forest populations across Europe. We find that, as predicted, urban individuals are paler than forest individuals. Interestingly, we also find large population-specific differences in the magnitude of the urban-forest contrast in plumage colouration. Moreover, our meta-analysis indicates a non-significant effect of environmental pollution on carotenoid-based plumage for the species, suggesting that the observed differences across urban populations are not only driven by pollution. Finally, using one region as an example (Malmö, Sweden), we reveal population-specific processes behind plumage colouration differences, which are likely the result of variation in the spatial and temporal distribution of carotenoid-rich resources in anthropogenic environments. This is the first study to quantify the consistency of an oft-cited textbook example of the impact of urbanisation on wildlife; our results provide the most convincing evidence to date of the “urban dullness” phenomenon, but also highlight that the magnitude of the phenomenon depends on local urban characteristics.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory