A scenario-guided strategy for the future management of biological invasions

Author:

Roura-Pascual NúriaORCID,Saul Wolf-ChristianORCID,Pérez-Granados CristianORCID,Rutting LucasORCID,Peterson Garry D.ORCID,Latombe GuillaumeORCID,Essl FranzORCID,Adriaens TimORCID,Aldridge David C.ORCID,Bacher SvenORCID,Bernardo-Madrid RubénORCID,Brotons LluísORCID,Diaz FrançoisORCID,Gallardo BelindaORCID,Genovesi PieroORCID,Golivets MarinaORCID,González-Moreno PabloORCID,Hall MarcusORCID,Kutlesa PetraORCID,Lenzner BerndORCID,Liu ChunlongORCID,Pagitz KonradORCID,Pastor TeresaORCID,Rabitsch WolfgangORCID,Robertson PeterORCID,Roy Helen E.ORCID,Seebens HannoORCID,Solarz WojciechORCID,Starfinger UweORCID,Tanner RobORCID,Vilà MontserratORCID,Leung BrianORCID,Garcia-Lozano CarlaORCID,Jeschke Jonathan M.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractFuture dynamics of biological invasions are highly uncertain because they depend on multiple environmental, societal and socio-economic drivers. We adopted a qualitative scenario approach to explore the future of invasive alien species (IAS) in Europe and created an overall strategy for their management that considers different plausible future developments. The scenarios and strategy were developed during two online workshops with a multidisciplinary team of experts. First, we downscaled four global scenarios of biological invasions to the European level. Second, we developed a management strategy structured into 19 goals that cover a broad array of IAS-related topics (i.e. policy, research, public awareness and biosecurity), and provided solutions for achieving these goals considering the European scenarios. Third, we identified four interrelated recommendations around which any long-term strategy for managing IAS in Europe can be structured: (i) a European biosecurity regime, (ii) a dedicated communication strategy, (iii) data standardization and management tools, and (iv) a monitoring and assessment system. Finally, we identified the feasibility of the IAS management strategy, finding strong differences among the four scenarios. High levels of technological development, public environmental awareness, and effectiveness of IAS policies facilitated the implementation of the overall management strategy. Together, our results indicate that it is time for a new management of biological invasions in Europe based on a more integrative perspective across sectors and countries to be better prepared for future challenges.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference38 articles.

1. A perceived gap between invasive species research and stakeholder priorities;NeoBiota,2013

2. DAMA: the global Distribution of Alien Mammals database;Ecology,2021

3. A benefit-cost analysis framework for prioritization of control programs for well-established invasive alien species;Neobiota,2021

4. CBD. 2010. Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi Targets. Nagoya, Japan: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environment Programme.

5. CBD. 2021. First draft of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. CBD/WG2020/3/3. United Nations Environmental Programme.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3