Modelling spatially autocorrelated detection probabilities in spatial capture-recapture using random effects
Author:
Dey SoumenORCID, Moqanaki Ehsan M.ORCID, Milleret CyrilORCID, Dupont PierreORCID, Tourani MahdiehORCID, Bischof RichardORCID
Abstract
AbstractSpatial capture-recapture (SCR) models are now widely used for estimating density from repeated individual spatial encounters. SCR accounts for the inherent spatial autocorrelation in individual detections by modelling detection probabilities as a function of distance between the detectors and individual activity centres. However, additional spatial heterogeneity in detection probability may still creep in due to environmental or sampling characteristics. if unaccounted for, such variation can lead to pronounced bias in population size estimates.Using simulations, we describe and test three Bayesian SCR models that use generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) to account for latent heterogeneity in baseline detection probability across detectors using: independent random effects (RE), spatially autocorrelated random effects (SARE), and a twogroup finite mixture model (FM).Overall, SARE provided the least biased population size estimates (median RB: -9 – 6%). When spatial autocorrelation was high, SARE also performed best at predicting the spatial pattern of heterogeneity in detection probability. At intermediate levels of autocorrelation, spatially-explicit estimates of detection probability obtained with FM where more accurate than those generated by SARE and RE. In cases where the number of detections per detector is realistically low (at most 1), all GLMMs considered here may require dimension reduction of the random effects by pooling baseline detection probability parameters across neighboring detectors (“aggregation”) to avoid over-parameterization.The added complexity and computational overhead associated with SCR-GLMMs may only be justified in extreme cases of spatial heterogeneity. However, even in less extreme cases, detecting and estimating spatially heterogeneous detection probability may assist in planning or adjusting monitoring schemes.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference37 articles.
1. Occupancy models for citizen-science data;Methods in Ecology and Evolution,2019 2. Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets 3. Bischof, R. , Milleret, C. , Dupont, P. , Chipperfield, J. , Tourani, M. , Ordiz, A. , de Valpine, P. , Turek, D. , Royle, J. A. , Gimenez, O. , Flagstad, Ø. , Åkesson, M. , Svensson, L. , Brøseth, H. , and Kindberg, J. (2020a). Estimating and forecasting spatial population dynamics of apex predators using transnational genetic monitoring. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 4. Bischof, R. , Turek, D. , Milleret, C. , Ergon, T. , Dupont, P. , and de Valpine, P. (2020b). nimbleSCR: Spatial Capture-Recapture (SCR) Methods Using ‘nimble’. R package version 0.1.0. 5. Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture-Recapture Studies
|
|