A Systematic review of ‘Fair’ AI model development for image classification and prediction

Author:

Correa Ramon,Shaan Mahtab,Trivedi Hari,Patel Bhavik,Celi Leo Anthony G.,Gichoya Judy W.,Banerjee ImonORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) models have demonstrated expert-level performance in image-based recognition and diagnostic tasks, resulting in increased adoption and FDA approvals for clinical applications. The new challenge in AI is to understand the limitations of models to reduce potential harm. Particularly, unknown disparities based on demographic factors could encrypt currently existing inequalities worsening patient care for some groups.MethodFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we present a systematic review of ‘fair’ deep learning modeling techniques for natural and medical image applications which were published between year 2011 to 2021. Our search used Covidence review management software and incorporates articles from PubMed, IEEE, and ACM search engines and three reviewers independently review the manuscripts.ResultsInter-rater agreement was 0.89 and conflicts were resolved by obtaining consensus between three reviewers. Our search initially retrieved 692 studies but after careful screening, our review included 22 manuscripts that carried four prevailing themes; ‘fair’ training dataset generation (4/22), representation learning (10/22), model disparity across institutions (5/22) and model fairness with respect to patient demographics (3/22). However, we observe that often discussion regarding fairness are also limited to analyzing existing bias without further establishing methodologies to overcome model disparities. Particularly for medical imaging, most papers lack the use of a standardized set of metrics to measure fairness/bias in algorithms.DiscussionWe benchmark the current literature regarding fairness in AI-based image analysis and highlighted the existing challenges. Based on the current research trends, exploration of adversarial learning for demographic/camera/institution agnostic models is an important direction to minimize disparity gaps for imaging. Privacy preserving approaches also present encouraging performance for both natural and medical image domain.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3