What innovations can address inequalities experienced by women and girls due to the COVID-19 pandemic across the different areas of life/domains: work, health, living standards, personal security, participation and education?

Author:

Spencer Llinos HafORCID,Hartfiel Ned,Hendry Annie,Anthony Bethany,Makanjuola Abraham,Pisavadia Kalpa,Davies Jacob,Bray Nathan,Hughes Dyfrig,Wilkinson Clare,Fitzsimmons Deb,Edwards Rhiannon Tudor

Abstract

TOPLINE SUMMARYWhat is a Rapid Review?Our rapid reviews use a variation of the systematic review approach, abbreviating or omitting some components to generate the evidence to inform stakeholders promptly whilst maintaining attention to bias. They follow the methodological recommendations and minimum standards for conducting and reporting rapid reviews, including a structured protocol, systematic search, screening, data extraction, critical appraisal and evidence synthesis to answer a specific question and identify key research gaps. They take one to two months, depending on the breadth and complexity of the research topic/question(s), the extent of the evidence base and type of analysis required for synthesis.Background / Aim of Rapid ReviewThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to differential economic, health and social impacts illuminating prevailing gender inequalities (WEN Wales, 2020). This rapid review investigated evidence for effectiveness of interventions to address gender inequalities across the domains of work, health, living standards, personal security, participation, and education.Key FindingsExtent of the evidence base21 studies were identified: 7 reviews, 6 commentaries and 8 primary studiesLimited evidence for the effectiveness of identified innovations in minority groupsA lack of evaluation data for educational interventionsA lack of evidence for cost-effectiveness of the identified interventions14 additional articles were identified in the grey literature but not used to inform findings (apart from the Education domain, where there was a lack of peer-reviewed evidence).Recency of the evidence baseAll studies were published in 2020-2021Summary of findingsSome evidence supported interventions/innovations related to work: Permanent contracts, full-time hours, and national childcare programmes to increase income for women and thereby decrease the existing gender wage gap.More frequent use of online platforms in the presentation of professional work can reduce gender disparities due to time saved in travel away from home. Some evidence supported interventions/innovations related to health: Leadership in digital health companies could benefit from women developing gender-friendly technology that meets the health needs of women.Create authentic partnerships with black women and female-led organisations to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality (Bray & McLemore, 2021). Some evidence supported interventions/innovations related to living standards including: Multi-dimensional care provided to women and their children experiencing homelessness. Limited evidence supported interventions/innovations related to personal security including: Specific training of social workers, psychologists and therapists to empower women to use coping strategies and utilise services to gain protection from abusive partners.Helplines, virtual safe spaces smart phone applications and online counselling to address issues of violence and abuse for women and girls. Very limited evidence supported interventions/innovations related to participation including: Use of online platforms to reduce gender disparities in the presentation of academic/professional work.Ensuring equal representation, including women and marginalised persons, in pandemic response and recovery planning and decision-making. Limited evidence from the grey literature described interventions/innovations related to education including: Teacher training curricula development to empower teachers to understand and challenge gender stereotypes in learning environments.Education for girls to enable participation in STEM.Policy ImplicationsThis evidence can be used to map against existing policies to identify which are supported by the evidence, which are not in current policy and could be implemented and where further research/evaluation is needed.Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of educational innovations, the effectiveness of the innovations in minority groups and the social value gained from interventions to address gender inequalities.Strength of EvidenceOne systematic review on mobile interventions targeting common mental disorders among pregnant and postpartum women was rated as high quality (Saad et al., 2021). The overall confidence in the strength of evidence was rated as ‘low’ due to study designs. Searches did not include COVID specific resources or pre-prints. There may be additional interventions/innovations that have been implemented to reduce inequalities experienced by women and girls due to the COVID-19 pandemic but have not been evaluated or published in the literature and are therefore not included here.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference54 articles.

1. Evidence-informed interventions and best practices for supporting women experiencing or at risk of homelessness: A scoping review with gender and equity analysis;Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada,2021

2. Azcona, G. , Bhatt, A. , Encarnacion, J. , Plazaola-Castano, J. , Seck, P. , Staab, S. , & Turquet, L. (2020). From insights to action: Gender equality in the wake of COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/Library/Publications/2020/Gender-equality-in-the-wake-of-COVID-19-en.pdf

3. Addressing the Mental and Emotional Health Impacts of COVID-19 on Children and Adolescents: Lessons From HIV/AIDS;Frontiers in Psychiatry,2021

4. Cardiovascular Physicians, Scientists, and Trainees Balancing Work and Caregiving Responsibilities in the COVID-19 Era: Sex and Race-Based Inequities;CJC Open,2021

5. Bourgault, S. , Peterman, A. , & O’Donnell, M. (2021). Violence against women and children during COVID-19 - One Year on and 100 papers in a fourth research round up. Center for Global Development.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3