Abstract
AbstractThe LoPF-Q 12-18 (Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire) was designed for clinical use and to promote early detection of personality disorder (PD). It is a self-report measure with 97 items to assess personality functioning in adolescents from 12 years up. It operationalizes the dimensional concept of personality disorder (PD) severity used in the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders and the ICD-11. In this study, we investigated the factorial structure of the LoPF-Q 12-18. Additionally, a short version was developed to meet the need of efficient screening for PD in clinical and research applications.To investigate the factorial structure, several confirmatory factor analysis models were compared. A bifactor model with a strong general factor and four specific factors showed the best nominal fit (CFI = .91, RMSEA = .04, SRMR = .07).The short version was derived using the ant colony optimization algorithm. This procedure resulted in a 20-item version with excellent fit for a hierarchical model with four first order factors to represent the domains and a secondary higher order factor to represent personality functioning (CFI = .98, RMSEA = .05, SRMR = .04). Clinical validity (effect size d= 3.1 between PD patients and controls) and clinical utility (cutoff ≥ 36 providing 87.5% specificity and 80.2% sensitivity) for detecting patients with PD were high for the short version. Both, the long and short LoPF-Q 12-18 version are ready to be used for research and diagnostic purposes.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference57 articles.
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington (USA): American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
2. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 11th ed. 2019.
3. Hengartner MP , Zimmermann J , Wright AGC . Personality pathology. In: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Shackelford TK, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences: Volume III: Applications of Personality and Individual Differences. SAGE; 2018.
4. The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis
5. A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders