Abstract
AbstractObjectiveIn September 2020, records of 15,861 SARS-CoV-2 cases failed to upload from the Second Generation Laboratory Surveillance System (SGSS) to the Contact Tracing Advisory Service (CTAS) tool, resulting in a delay in the contact tracing of these cases. This study used CTAS data to determine the impact of this delay on health outcomes: transmission events, hospitalisations, and mortality. Previously, a modelling study had suggested a substantial impact.DesignObservational studySettingEngland.PopulationIndividuals testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and their reported contacts.Main outcome measuresSecondary attack rates (SARs), hospitalisations, and deaths amongst primary and secondary contacts were calculated, compared to all other concurrent, unaffected cases. SGSS records affected by the event were matched to CTAS records and successive contacts and cases were identified.ResultsThe initiation of contact tracing was delayed by 3 days on average in the primary cases in the delay group (6 days) compared to the control group (3 days). This was associated with lower completion of contact tracing of primary cases in the delay group: 80% (95%CI: 79-81%) in the delay group and 83% (95%CI: 83-84%) in the control group. There was some evidence to suggest an increase in transmission to non-household contacts amongst those affected by the delay. The SAR for non-household contacts was higher amongst secondary contacts in the delay group than the control group (delay group: 7.9%, 95%CI:6.4% to 9.2%; control group: 5.9%, 95%CI: 5.3% to 6.6%). There was no evidence of a difference between the delay and control groups in the odds of hospitalisation (crude odds ratio: 1.1 (95%CI: 0.9 to 1.2) or death (crude odds ratio: 0.7 (0.1 to 4.0)) amongst secondary contacts.ConclusionsThe delay in contact tracing had a limited impact on population health outcomes.Strengths and limitations of the studyShows empirical data on the health impact of an event leading to a delay in contact tracing so can test hypotheses generated by models of the potential impact of a delay in contact tracingEstimates the extent of further transmission and odds of increased mortality or hospitalisation in up to the third generation of cases affected by the eventThe event acts as a natural experiment to describe the possible impact of contact tracing, comparing a group affected by chance by delayed contact tracing to a control group who experienced no delayContact tracing was not completed for all individuals, so the study might not capture all affected contacts or transmissions
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference29 articles.
1. UK Government (2021). Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the UK. UK summary. Available from https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/. Accessed on 25.04.22
2. Public Health England (2021) NHS Test and Trace Available from https://contact-tracing.phe.gov.uk/. Accessed on 01.12.21
3. Public Health England (2020) Letter from Richard Gleave, Deputy Chief Executive of Public Health England, describing the use of CTAS in the COVID-19 response. Available from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/881231/LettertoDsPHoncontacttracing.pdf. Accessed on 01.12.21
4. Efficacy of contact tracing for the containment of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)
5. Public Health England (2020). PHE statement on delayed reporting of COVID-19 cases. Available from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/phe-statement-on-delayed-reporting-of-covid-19-cases. Accessed on 01.12.21
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献