Changes in English medication safety indicators throughout the COVID-19 pandemic: a federated analysis of 57 million patients’ primary care records in situ using OpenSAFELY
Author:
Fisher LouisORCID, Hopcroft Lisa E. M.ORCID, Rodgers SarahORCID, Barrett James, Oliver KerryORCID, Avery Anthony J.ORCID, Evans DaiORCID, Curtis HelenORCID, Croker RichardORCID, Macdonald Orla, Morley JessicaORCID, Mehrkar AmirORCID, Bacon SebORCID, Davy Simon, Dillingham Iain, Evans DavidORCID, Hickman GeorgeORCID, Inglesby Peter, Morton Caroline E.ORCID, Smith Becky, Ward Tom, Hulme WilliamORCID, Green AmeliaORCID, Massey JonORCID, Walker Alex J.ORCID, Bates ChrisORCID, Cockburn JonathanORCID, Parry John, Hester Frank, Harper Sam, O’Hanlon Shaun, Eavis Alex, Jarvis Richard, Avramov Dima, Griffiths Paul, Fowles Aaron, Parkes Nasreen, Goldacre BenORCID, MacKenna BrianORCID
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on safe prescribing, using the PINCER prescribing indicators; to implement complex prescribing indicators at national scale using GP data.DesignPopulation based cohort study, with the approval of NHS England using the OpenSAFELY platform.SettingElectronic health record data from 56.8 million NHS patients’ general practice records.ParticipantsAll NHS patients registered at a GP practice using TPP or EMIS computer systems and recorded as at risk of at least one potentially hazardous PINCER indicator between September 2019 and September 2021.Main outcome measureMonthly trends and between-practice variation for compliance with 13 PINCER measures between September 2019 and September 2021.ResultsThe indicators were successfully implemented across GP data in OpenSAFELY. Hazardous prescribing remained largely unchanged during the COVID-19 pandemic, with only small reductions in achievement of the PINCER indicators. There were transient delays in blood test monitoring for some medications, particularly ACE inhibitors. All indicators exhibited substantial recovery by September 2021. We identified 1,813,058 patients at risk of at least one hazardous prescribing event.ConclusionGood performance was maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic across a diverse range of widely evaluated measures of safe prescribing.Summary boxWHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICPrimary care services were substantially disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic.Disruption to safe prescribing during the pandemic has not previously been evaluated.PINCER is a nationally adopted programme of activities that aims to identify and correct hazardous prescribing in GP practices, by conducting manual audit on subgroups of practices.WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSFor the first time, we were able to successfully generate data on PINCER indicators for almost the whole population of England, in a single analysis.Our study is the most comprehensive assessment of medication safety during the COVID-19 pandemic in England, covering 95% of the population using well-validated measures.Good performance was maintained across many PINCER indicators throughout the pandemic.Delays in delivering some medication-related blood test monitoring were evident though considerable recovery was made by the end of the study period.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference29 articles.
1. Medication Without Harm: WHO's Third Global Patient Safety Challenge 2. About the WHO Medication Without Harm Global Patient Safety Challenge [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Oct 8]. Available from: https://www.sps.nhs.uk/articles/about-the-who-medication-without-harm-global-patient-safety-challenge/ 3. Carr MJ , Wright AK , Leelarathna L , Thabit H , Milne N , Kanumilli N , et al. Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on diabetes health checks and prescribing for people with type 2 diabetes: a UK-wide cohort study involving 618 161 people in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf [Internet]. 2021 Oct 12; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013613 4. Walker AJ , Tazare J , Hickman G , Rentsch CT , Williamson EJ , Bhaskaran K , et al. Changes in the rate of cardiometabolic and pulmonary events during the COVID-19 pandemic. medRxiv preprint [Internet]. 2021 Feb 19 [cited 2021 Oct 28]; Available from: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4660738/ 5. Mansfield KE , Mathur R , Tazare J , Henderson A , Mulick A , Carreira H , et al. COVID-19 Collateral: Indirect Acute Effects of the Pandemic on Physical and Mental Health in the UK [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Oct 28]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3719882
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|