Socioeconomic inequalities in blood pressure: co-ordinated analysis of 147,775 participants from repeated birth cohort and cross-sectional datasets, 1989 to 2016

Author:

Bann David,Fluharty Meg,Hardy Rebecca,Scholes Shaun

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether socioeconomic inequalities in blood pressure (BP) have changed from 1989 to 2016—a period in which average BP levels declined and the detection and treatment of high BP increased.DesignRepeated observational studies.Setting3 nationally representative British birth cohort studies—born in 1946, 1958, and 1970—and 21 nationally representative cross-sectional studies (Health Survey for England 1994 to 2016, HSE).Participants147,775 participants with BP outcomes at age 42-46 years (cohorts) or 25 years and over (HSE).Main outcome measureAbsolute differences in systolic BP (SBP) by educational attainment (cohorts and HSE) and early life social class (cohorts).ResultsIn both datasets, lower education was associated with higher SBP, with similar absolute magnitudes of inequality across the studied period. Differences in SBP by education (Slope Index of Inequality) based on HSE data were 3.0mmHg (95% CI: 1.8, 4.2) in 1994 and 4.3mmHg (2.3, 6.3) in 2016. Findings were similar for diastolic BP (DBP) and survey-defined hypertension. Cohort data suggested that disadvantage in early and adult life had cumulative independent associations with BP: cohort-pooled differences in SBP were 4.9mmHg (3.7, 6.1) in a score combining early life social class and own education, yet were 3.4mmHg (2.4, 4.4) for education alone. In both datasets, inequalities were found across the SBP distribution—below and above hypertension thresholds—yet were larger at the upper tail; in HSE, median SBP differences were 2.8mmHg (1.7, 3.9) yet 5.6mmHg (4.9, 6.4) at the 90th quantile.ConclusionSocioeconomic inequalities in BP have persisted from 1989 to 2016, despite improved detection and treatment of high BP. To achieve future reductions in BP inequalities, policies addressing the wider structural determinants of high BP levels are likely required—targeting detection and treatment alone is unlikely to be sufficient.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference59 articles.

1. Systolic blood pressure reduction and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and network meta-analysis;JAMA cardiology,2017

2. Is the long-term decline in cardiovascular-disease mortality in high-income countries over? Evidence from national vital statistics

3. Association Between Midlife Vascular Risk Factors and Estimated Brain Amyloid Deposition

4. Lane CA , Barnes J , Nicholas JM , et al. Associations between blood pressure across adulthood and late-life brain structure and pathology in the neuroscience substudy of the 1946 British birth cohort (Insight 46): an epidemiological study. The Lancet Neurology 2019

5. Hypertension is a potential risk factor for vascular dementia: systematic review

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3