Binary and analog variation of synapses between cortical pyramidal neurons
Author:
Dorkenwald SvenORCID, Turner Nicholas L.ORCID, Macrina ThomasORCID, Lee Kisuk, Lu Ran, Wu JingpengORCID, Bodor Agnes L., Bleckert Adam A.ORCID, Brittain DerrickORCID, Kemnitz Nico, Silversmith William M.ORCID, Ih Dodam, Zung Jonathan, Zlateski Aleksandar, Tartavull Ignacio, Yu Szi-Chieh, Popovych Sergiy, Wong William, Castro Manuel, Jordan Chris S., Wilson Alyssa M., Froudarakis Emmanouil, Buchanan JoAnnORCID, Takeno MarcORCID, Torres RusselORCID, Mahalingam Gayathri, Collman ForrestORCID, Schneider-Mizell CaseyORCID, Bumbarger Daniel J., Li Yang, Becker Lynne, Suckow Shelby, Reimer JacobORCID, Tolias Andreas S.ORCID, Maçarico da Costa NunoORCID, Reid R. ClayORCID, Seung H. SebastianORCID
Abstract
AbstractLearning from experience depends at least in part on changes in neuronal connections. We present the largest map of connectivity to date between cortical neurons of a defined type (L2/3 pyramidal cells), which was enabled by automated analysis of serial section electron microscopy images with improved handling of image defects. We used the map to identify constraints on the learning algorithms employed by the cortex. Previous cortical studies modeled a continuum of synapse sizes (Arellano et al. 2007) by a log-normal distribution (Loewenstein, Kuras, and Rumpel 2011; de Vivo et al. 2017; Santuy et al. 2018). A continuum is consistent with most neural network models of learning, in which synaptic strength is a continuously graded analog variable. Here we show that synapse size, when restricted to synapses between L2/3 pyramidal cells, is well-modeled by the sum of a binary variable and an analog variable drawn from a log-normal distribution. Two synapses sharing the same presynaptic and postsynaptic cells are known to be correlated in size (Sorra and Harris 1993; Koester and Johnston 2005; Bartol et al. 2015; Kasthuri et al. 2015; Dvorkin and Ziv 2016; Bloss et al. 2018; Motta et al. 2019). We show that the binary variables of the two synapses are highly correlated, while the analog variables are not. Binary variation could be the outcome of a Hebbian or other synaptic plasticity rule depending on activity signals that are relatively uniform across neuronal arbors, while analog variation may be dominated by other influences. We discuss the implications for the stability-plasticity dilemma.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference90 articles.
1. Adam, Paszke , Chintala Soumith , Chanan Gregory , Yang Edward , Devito Zachary , Lin Zeming , Desmaison Alban , Antiga Luca , and Lerer Adam . 2017. “Automatic Differentiation in Pytorch.” In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems. 2. Advisory Committee to the NIH Director BRAIN Initiative Working Group 2. 2019. “The BRAIN Initiative 2.0: From Cells to Circuits, Toward Cures.” National Institutes of Health. 3. Learning in Neural Networks with Material Synapses 4. Arellano, J. I. , R. Benavides-Piccione , J. DeFelipe , and R. Yuste . 2007. “Ultrastructure of Dendritic Spines: Correlation between Synaptic and Spine Morphologies Front Neurosci 1: 131--143.” CrossRef Medline. 5. Nanoconnectomic upper bound on the variability of synaptic plasticity
Cited by
56 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|