Improving Adherence to Pulmonary Embolism Evaluation Consensus Guidelines: A Multimodal Approach

Author:

D’Silva E Ethan,Zaidi Syed,Ramis Phil,Rohren Eric M.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveDespite the publication of multiple widely accepted guidelines, Computed Tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) remains overutilized in the emergency (ED) setting for evaluating suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). We developed and evaluated a multimodal program that aimed to improve ordering provider adherence to CTPA use guidelines, and consequently positivity rate.MethodsWe retrospectively identified all CTPA studies ordered for suspected PE over three years for each provider at a single-center ED, and reviewed radiology reports to determine PE positivity. We then implemented a program that included an education session, individualized performance feedback, and discussion of possible incentives to improve guideline adherence. We prospectively collected CTPA results for the following year. Our primary outcome was the difference in positivity rate between the final preintervention year and the post-intervention year. Our secondary outcome was individual provider positivity rate between the pre-intervention and post-intervention period. We compared the primary outcome using chi-squared testing, defining statistical significance as P<0.05.ResultsWe identified 4265 CTPA studies performed during the pre-intervention period, ordered by 25 providers. 1582 studies were ordered during the final year, with an 11.00% positivity rate (174/1582). In the post-intervention year, 1339 studies were ordered, with a significantly greater positivity rate of 13.67% (183/1339, P = 0.028). For our secondary outcome, mean provider positivity rate was 11.49% during the preintervention period, and increased to 14.24% in the post-intervention period.DiscussionWe successfully implemented a multimodal program for ED providers that significantly increased the positivity rate of CTPAs ordered for suspected PE evaluation.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3