Abstract
AbstractApproaches to regenerating bone often rely on the integration of biomaterials and biological signals in the form of cells or cytokines. However, from a translational point of view, these approaches face challenges due to the sourcing and quality of the biologic, unpredictable immune responses, complex regulatory paths, and high costs. We describe a simple manufacturing process and a material-centric 3D-printed composite scaffold system (CSS) that offers distinct advantages for clinical translation. The CSS comprises a 3D-printed porous polydiolcitrate-hydroxyapatite composite elastomer infused with a polydiolcitrate-graphene oxide hydrogel composite. Using a continuous liquid interface production 3D printer, we fabricate a precise porous ceramic scaffold with 60% hydroxyapatite content resembling natural bone. The resulting scaffold integrates with a thermoresponsive hydrogel composite, customizablein situto fit the defect. This hybrid phasic porous CSS mimics the bone microenvironment (inorganic and organic) while allowing independent control of each material phase (rigid and soft). The CSS stimulates osteogenic differentiationin vitroandin vivo. Moreover, it promotes M2 polarization and blood vessel ingrowth, which are crucial for supporting bone formation. Our comprehensive micro-CT analysis revealed that within 4 weeks in a critical-size defect model, the CSS accelerated ECM deposition (8-fold) and mineralized osteoid (69-fold) compared to the untreated. Our material-centric approach delivers impressive osteogenic properties and streamlined manufacturing advantages, potentially expediting clinical application for bone reconstruction surgeries.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference84 articles.
1. Trends in Medicare Reimbursement for the Top 20 Surgical Procedures in Craniofacial Trauma;Journal of Craniofacial Surgery,2023
2. Reconstruction of pediatric cranial base defects: a review of a single microsurgeon’s 30-year experience;Journal of Craniofacial Surgery,2009
3. S. Bhumiratana , J. C. Bernhard , D. M. Alfi , K. Yeager , R. E. Eton , J. Bova , F. Shah , J. M. Gimble , M. J. Lopez , S. B. Eisig , Tissue-engineered autologous grafts for facial bone reconstruction. Science translational medicine 8, 343ra383-343ra383 (2016).
4. Bone graft materials: an overview of the basic science;Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®,2000
5. Materials design for bone-tissue engineering;Nature Reviews Materials,2020