The benefits and harms of oral iron supplementation in non-anaemic pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Watt ArchieORCID,Eaton HoldenORCID,Eastwick-Jones KateORCID,Thomas ElizabethORCID,Plüddemann AnnetteORCID

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveIron deficiency during pregnancy poses a significant risk to both maternal and foetal health. Despite increased iron requirements during pregnancy, current UK NICE guidelines do not give clear advice on antenatal iron supplementation for non-anaemic women. We aimed to assess whether the benefits of routine antenatal supplementation outweigh potential harms for non-anaemic women.MethodsThe Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase and clinical trial registries were searched for randomised control trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing oral iron supplementation with placebo or no supplement in non-anaemic pregnant women. The relevant data were extracted, and the risk of bias for included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Where appropriate, meta-analysis was conducted using ‘R’.Results23 eligible studies were identified including 4492 non-anaemic women who were followed through pregnancy. Haemoglobin and ferritin levels were consistently higher in individuals receiving iron compared with control groups, although both findings were associated with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2= 92% and 87% respectively) and therefore did not warrant a pooled analysis. Iron supplementation was associated with a significant reduction in rate of maternal anaemia (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.22 - 0.61, p<.001; I2= 54%; moderate certainty, NNT 8). There was no significant effect of intervention on birth weight (MD = 22.97g, 95% CI = -56.27 to 102.22, p = 0.57; I2= 64%; very low certainty). Of the 18 studies reporting adverse effects, none found a significant influence of supplementation on GI disturbance, caesarean sections or preterm births.ConclusionsProphylactic iron supplementation reduces the risk of maternal anaemia in pregnancy. Limited evidence was found relating to the harms of supplementation in non-anaemic pregnant women, highlighting the need for further research to inform practice guidelines and support clinical decision making.RegistrationThe study protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/HKZ4C).Key PointsWhat is this research focused on exploring, validating, or solving?Antenatal iron supplementation is known to benefit pregnant women with iron deficiency anaemia, resulting in improved maternal and foetal outcomes. We explored whether these beneficial effects extend to non-anaemic pregnant women and whether they outweigh potential harms of supplementation.What conclusions did this research draw through design, method, and analysis?We have shown that supplementation of non-anaemic women helps prevent maternal anaemia and increases maternal haemoglobin. We have also identified a significant paucity in available evidence surrounding side effects of iron supplementation.What is the value, meaning and impact of your research? Is there any followup study based on this research?By clarifying the benefits of supplementation, we hope to assist decision making in primary care. This is particularly relevant given the current discrepancies in international guidelines. Our findings strengthen the evidence base in favour of universal supplementation, but focused research into side effects is still required to better qualify risk.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference49 articles.

1. Anaemia - iron deficiency | Health topics A to Z | CKS | NICE [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 8]. Available from: https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/anaemia-iron-deficiency/

2. Effects of hemoglobin levels during pregnancy on adverse maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Ann N Y Acad Sci,2019

3. Iron deficiency without anaemia: a diagnosis that matters

4. Iron Deficiency and Brain Development

5. The Role of Iron in Brain Development: A Systematic Review;Nutrients,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3