The Diagnostic Potential of Combined Photoplethysmography and Ankle-Brachial Index in Peripheral Arterial Obstructive Disease: A Comparative Analysis with Doppler Ultrasound

Abstract

AbstractBackground and aimsWhile ankle-brachial index (ABI) and photoplethysmography (PPG) have also shown adequate sensitivity in detecting PAOD, their accuracies can be compromised in detecting milder cases. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic value of combining ABI and PPG in detecting PAOD for subjects with high atherosclerotic cardiovascular risks compared to duplex sonography.Methods130 participants underwent ABI, PPG, and duplex sonography during the evaluation process. Two parameters were derived from the PPG-PPG amplitude ratio of the lower-to-upper extremities (PPGratio) and the PPG amplitude of the lower extremity (PPGamp). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under receiver operative curve (AUC) were calculated for PPG parameters and ABI, and the combination of both methods. Multivariate analysis was performed for adjusting other relevant risk factors.Results65 participants were diagnosed with PAOD based on duplex sonography. The ROC analysis revealed optimal cut-off values in diagnosing PAOD were 0.417 for PPGratioand 58 for PPGamp. Both PPGratioand PPGampdemonstrated significantly higher sensitivities, 78.4% and 75.7%, in comparison to 55.9% of ABI<0.9 (p<0.05). Lower PPGratioand PPGampremained independently associated with PAOD even after adjusting for confounding factors. The AUC of combination models, including model 1 (ABI and PPGratio), model 2 (ABI and PPGamp), and model 3 (ABI, PPGratio, and PPGamp), exhibited improved performance with AUCs of 0.922, 0.922, and 0.931 (all p<0.01) compared to that of ABI alone (AUC:0.822).ConclusionsThe combination of ABI and PPG increases the sensitivity and accuracy prominently in diagnosing PAOD compared to ABI or PPG alone.