Author:
Baughman Owen W.,Agneray Alison C.,Forister Matthew L.,Kilkenny Francis F.,Espeland Erin K.,Fiegener Rob,Horning Matthew E.,Johnson Richard C.,Kaye Thomas N.,Ott Jeffrey E.,Clair J. Bradley St.,Leger Elizabeth A.
Abstract
AbstractVariation in natural selection across heterogenous landscapes often produces 1) among-population differences in phenotypic traits, 2) trait-by-environment associations, and 3) higher fitness of local populations. Using a broad literature search, we documented the frequency of these three signatures in plants native to North America’s Great Basin and asked which traits and environmental variables were involved. We also asked, independent of geographic distance, whether populations from more similar environments had more similar traits. From 327 experiments testing 121 taxa in 170 studies, we found 95.1% of 305 experiments reported among-population differences, and 81.4% of 161 experiments reported trait-by-environment associations. Locals showed greater survival in 67% of 24 reciprocal experiments that reported survival, and higher fitness in 90% of 10 reciprocal experiments that reported reproductive output. Variation in eight commonly-measured traits was associated with mean annual precipitation and mean annual temperature at the source location, with notably strong relationships for flowering phenology, leaf size, and survival, among others. Although the Great Basin is sometimes perceived as environmentally homogenous, our results demonstrate widespread habitat-related population differentiation and local adaptation, suggesting that locally-sourced plants likely harbor restoration-relevant adaptations, and that certain key traits and environmental variables should be prioritized in future assessments of plants.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory