The comparative and genetic methods for East European Unionidae taxonomy

Abstract

AbstractTaxonomy of freshwater mussels from family Unionidae has been ambiguous for a long time. A number of methods used for their identification, including the so-called comparative method, are based on shell morphology. However, this morphology turned out to have a high level of within-species variation, and the shape of the shell of a specimen depends strongly on its environment and conditions of growth. For these reasons, the number of species recognized by the comparative method kept increasing. We applied both the comparative morphological method and methods of molecular genetics to address the taxonomy of Unionidae. We performed the comprehensive study of 70 specimens of Unionidae mussels collected from the River Ivitza, Volga basin. The specimens represented 14 comparative species, belonging to 4 comparative genera of Unionidae: Colletopterum, Pseudanodonta, Unio and Crassiana. Sequencing of the nuclear (ITS1) and mitochondrial (COI, 16S rDNA) genetic regions revealed 5 groups with high within-group genetic homogeneity separated from each other by long genetic distances. According to the comparison with the available sequences, these groups correspond to 3 Eastern European genera and 5 species: Anodonta anatina, Pseudanodonta complanata, Unio pictorum, Unio tumidus and Unio crassus. The results obtained indicate that the comparative method is inappropriate for the taxonomic analysis of East European Unionidae.