A standard protocol to report discrete stage-structured demographic information

Author:

Gascoigne Samuel J. L.ORCID,Rolph SimonORCID,Sankey Daisy,Nidadavolu Nagalakshmi,Pičman Adrian S. Stell,Hernández Christina M.,Philpott Matthew E. R.,Salam Aiyla,Bernard Connor,Fenollosa ErolaORCID,Lee Young Jun,McLean Jessie,Perera Shathuki Hetti Achchige,Spacey Oliver G.,Kajin Maja,Vinton Anna C.ORCID,Archer C. RuthORCID,Burns Jean H.ORCID,Buss Danielle L.ORCID,Caswell HalORCID,Che-Castaldo Judy P.ORCID,Childs Dylan Z.ORCID,Capdevila PolORCID,Compagnoni AldoORCID,Crone Elizabeth,Ezard Thomas H. G.ORCID,Hodgson Dave,Knight Tiffany M.ORCID,Jones Owen R.ORCID,Jongejans EelkeORCID,McDonald Jenni,Tenhumberg BrigitteORCID,Thomas Chelsea C.,Tyre Andrew J.ORCID,Ramula Satu,Stott IainORCID,Tremblay Raymond L.ORCID,Wilson Phil,Vaupel James W.ORCID,Salguero-Gómez Roberto

Abstract

AbstractStage-based demographic methods, such as matrix population models (MPMs), are powerful tools used to address a broad range of fundamental questions in ecology, evolutionary biology, and conservation science. Accordingly, MPMs now exist for over 3,000 species worldwide. These data are being digitised as an ongoing process and periodically released into two large open-access online repositories: the COMPADRE Plant Matrix Database and the COMADRE Animal Matrix Database. During the last decade, data archiving and curation of COMPADRE and COMADRE, and subsequent comparative research, have revealed pronounced variation in how MPMs are parameterized and reported.Here, we summarise current issues related to the parameterisation and reporting of MPMs that arise most frequently and outline how they affect MPM construction, analysis, and interpretation. To quantify variation in how MPMs are reported, we present results from a survey identifying key aspects of MPMs that are frequently unreported in manuscripts. We then screen COMPADRE and COMADRE to quantify how often key pieces of information are omitted from manuscripts using MPMs.Over 80% of surveyed researchers (n=60) state a clear benefit to adopting more standardised methodologies for reporting MPMs. Furthermore, over 85% of the 300 MPMs assessed from COMPADRE and COMADRE omitted one or more elements that are key to their accurate interpretation. Based on these insights, we identify fundamental issues that can arise from MPM construction and communication and provide suggestions to improve clarity, reproducibility, and future research utilising MPMs and their required metadata. To fortify reproducibility and empower researchers to take full advantage of their demographic data, we introduce a standardized protocol to present MPMs in publications. This standard is linked towww.compadre-db.org, so that authors wishing to archive their MPMs can do so prior to submission of publications, following examples from other open-access repositories such as DRYAD, Figshare, and Zenodo.Combining and standardising MPMs parameterized from populations around the globe and across the tree of life opens up powerful research opportunities in evolutionary biology, ecology, and conservation research. However, this potential can only be fully realised by adopting standardised methods to ensure reproducibility.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3