Consistency across multi-omics layers in a drug-perturbed gut microbial community

Author:

Wuyts SanderORCID,Alves RenatoORCID,Zimmermann-Kogadeeva MariaORCID,Nishijima SuguruORCID,Blasche Sonja,Driessen Marja,Geyer Philipp E.ORCID,Hercog Rajna,Kartal EceORCID,Maier LisaORCID,Müller Johannes B.ORCID,Santamarina Sarela GarciaORCID,Schmidt Thomas Sebastian B.ORCID,Sevin Daniel C.ORCID,Telzerow Anja,Treit Peter V.ORCID,Wenzel TobiasORCID,Typas AthanasiosORCID,Patil Kiran R.ORCID,Mann MatthiasORCID,Kuhn MichaelORCID,Bork PeerORCID

Abstract

AbstractMulti-omics analyses are increasingly employed in microbiome studies to obtain a holistic view of molecular changes occurring within microbial communities exposed to different conditions. However, it is not always clear to what extent each omics data type contributes to our understanding of the community dynamics and whether they are concordant with each other. Here we map the molecular response of a synthetic community of 32 human gut bacteria to three non-antibiotic drugs by using five omics layers, namely 16S rRNA gene profiling, metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics, and metabolomics. Using this controlled setting, we find that all omics methods with species resolution in their readouts are highly consistent in estimating relative species abundances across conditions. Furthermore, different omics methods complement each other in their ability to capture functional changes in response to the drug perturbations. For example, while nearly all omics data types captured that the antipsychotic drug chlorpromazine selectively inhibits Bacteroidota representatives in the community, the metatranscriptome and metaproteome suggested that the drug induces stress responses related to protein quality control and metabolomics revealed a decrease in polysaccharide uptake, likely caused by Bacteroidota depletion. Taken together, our study provides insights into how multi-omics datasets can be utilised to reveal complex molecular responses to external perturbations in microbial communities.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3