Abstract
ABSTRACTIntroductionIncome, a component of socioeconomic status, influences cancer risk as a social determinant of health. We evaluated the independent associations between individual- and area-level income, and site-specific cancer incidence in Canada.MethodsWe used data from the 2006 and 2011 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohorts, which are probabilistically linked datasets constituted by 5.9 million and 6.5 million respondents of the 2006 Canadian long-form census and 2011 National Household Survey, respectively. Individuals were linked to the Canadian Cancer Registry through 2015. Individual-level income was derived using after-tax household income adjusted for household size. Annual tax return postal codes were used to assign area-level household income quintiles to individuals for each year of follow-up. We calculated age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) and rate ratios for cancers overall and by site. We conducted multivariable negative binomial regression to adjust these rates for other demographic and socioeconomic variables.ResultsIndividuals of lower individual- and area-level income had higher ASIRs compared to those in the wealthiest income quintile for head and neck, oropharyngeal, esophageal, stomach, colorectal, anal, liver, pancreas, lung, cervical, and kidney and renal pelvis cancers. Conversely, individuals of wealthier individual- and area-level income had higher ASIRs for melanoma, leukemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, breast, uterine, prostate, and testicular cancers. Most differences in site-specific incidence by income quintile remained after adjustment.ConclusionsAlthough Canada’s publicly funded healthcare system provides universal coverage, inequalities in cancer incidence persist across individual- and area-level income gradients. Our estimates suggest that individual- and area-level income affect cancer incidence through independent mechanisms.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference50 articles.
1. Kroenke C , Kawachi I. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Thun M , Linet MS , Cerhan JR , Haiman CA , Schottenfeld D , editors: Oxford University Press; 2017 21 Dec 2017.
2. Socioeconomic status and health: Youth development and neomaterialist and psychosocial mechanisms;Social Science & Medicine,2008
3. Agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: Implications for population health research
4. On the validity of area-based income measures to proxy household income
5. Trends in Area-Socioeconomic and Race-Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Incidence, Stage at Diagnosis, Screening, Mortality, and Survival among Women Ages 50 Years and Over (1987-2005)