Nanovirseq: dsRNA sequencing for plant virus and viroid detection by Nanopore sequencing

Author:

Javaran Vahid J.ORCID,Poursalavati AbdonaserORCID,Lemoyne Pierre,Ste-Croix Dave T.,Moffett PetterORCID,Fall Mamadou L.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractWorldwide, there is a need for certified clean plant materials to limit viral diseases spread. In order to design a robust and proactive viral-like disease certification, diagnostics, and management program, it is essential to have a fast, inexpensive, and user-friendly tool. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dsRNA-based nanopore sequencing can be a reliable method for the detection of viruses and viroids in grapevines or not. Compared to direct RNA sequencing from rRNA-depleted total RNA (rdTotalRNA), direct-cDNA sequencing from dsRNA (dsRNAcD) yielded more viral reads and detected all grapevine viruses and viroids detected using Illumina MiSeq sequencing (dsRNA-MiSeq). With dsRNAcD sequencing it was possible to detect low abundance viruses (e.g., Grapevine red globe virus) where rdTotalRNA sequencing failed to detect them. Indeed, even after removing rRNA, rdTotalRNA sequencing yielded low viral read numbers. rdTotalRNA sequencing was not sensitive enough to detect all the viruses detected by dsRNA-MiSeq. In addition, there was a false positive identification of a viroid in the rdTotalRNA sequencing that was due to misannotation of a host-driven read. For quick and accurate reads classification, two different taxonomical classification workflows based on protein and nucleotide homology were evaluated in this study, namely DIAMOND&MEGAND (DIA&MEG) and Centrifuge&Recentrifuge (Cent&Rec), respectively. Virome profiles from both workflows were similar except for grapevine endophyte endornavirus (GEEV), which was only detected using DIA&MEG. However, because DIA&MEG’s classification is based on protein homology, it cannot detect viroid infection despite giving more robust results. Even though Cent&Rec’s virus and viroid detection workflow was faster (30 minutes) than DIA&MEG’s (two hours), it could not provide the details and information DIA&MEG was able to provide. As demonstrated in our study, nanopore dsRNAcD sequencing and the proposed data analysis workflows are suitable and reliable for viruses and viroids detection, especially in grapevine where viral mixed infection is common.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference76 articles.

1. International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV). State of the World Vine and Wine Sector 2021 [Available from: https://www.oiv.int/public/medias/8778/eng-state-of-the-world-vine-and-wine-sector-april-2022-v6.pdf.

2. The Economic Impact of the Wine and Grape Industry in Canada 2019: Wine Growers Canada; 2019 [Available from: https://www.winegrowerscanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/RPT-Canadian-Wine-Economic-Impact-2019-1.pdf.

3. Martelli GP. An Overview on Grapevine Viruses, Viroids, and the Diseases They Cause. In: Meng B , Martelli GP , Golino DA , Fuchs M , editors. Grapevine Viruses: Molecular Biology, Diagnostics and Management. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 31–46.

4. Javaran VJ , Moffett P , Lemoyne P , Xu D , Adkar-Purushothama CR , Fall ML. Grapevine Virology in the Third-Generation Sequencing Era: From Virus Detection to Viral Epitranscriptomics. Plants. 2021;10(11).

5. Grapevine viruses: a multitude of diverse species with simple but overall poorly adopted management solutions in the vineyard;Journal of Plant Pathology,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Recent advances and challenges in plant viral diagnostics;Frontiers in Plant Science;2024-08-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3