Understanding how a digital mental health intervention can be optimised to ensure effectiveness in the longer-term: findings from a causal mediation analyses of the CONEMO trials

Author:

Seward NadineORCID,Loh Wen WeiORCID,Miranda J. JaimeORCID,Diez-Canseco Francisco,Claro Heloisa Garcia,Menezes Paulo Rossi,de Almeida Lopes Fernandes Ivan Filipe,Araya RicardoORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTwo CONEMO trials in Lima, Peru and São Paulo, Brazil evaluated a digital mental health intervention (DMHI) based on behavioural activation (BA) that demonstrated improvements in symptoms of depression between trial arms at three-months, but not at six-months. To understand how we can optimize CONEMO in the longer-term, we therefore aim to investigate mediators through which the DMHI improved symptoms of depression at six-months, separately for the two trials and then using a pooled dataset.MethodsWe used data that included adults with depression (Patient Health Questionnaire – 9 (PHQ-9) score ≥10) and comorbid hypertension and/or diabetes. Interventional effects were used to decompose the total effect of DMHI on symptoms of depression at six months into indirect effects via: understanding the content of the sessions without difficulty; number of activities completed that were self-selected to improve levels of BA; and levels of activation measured using the Behavioural Activation for Depression Short Form (BADS-SF).FindingsUsing the pooled dataset, understanding the content of the sessions without difficulty mediated a 10% [0.10: 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.15] improvement in PHQ-9 scores at six months; completing self-selected activities mediated a 12% improvement [0.12: 0.01 to 0.23]; and, lastly, BA mediated a 2% [0.02: 0.01, 0.05] improvement.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that targeting participants to complete activities they find enjoyable will help to improve levels of activation and maintain the effect of the CONEMO intervention in the longer-term. Improving the content of the sessions to facilitate understanding can also help to maintain improvements.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3