Intermittent access cocaine self-administration produces psychomotor sensitization: effects of withdrawal, sex and cross-sensitization

Abstract

AbstractThe psychomotor activating effects of drugs such as cocaine or amphetamine can change in very different ways – showing sensitization or tolerance – depending on whether they are administered more or less intermittently. This behavioral plasticity is thought to reflect, at least in part, changes in dopamine (DA) neurotransmission, and therefore, may provide insights into how repeated drug use promotes the development of substance use disorders. Indeed, the most widely used preclinical model of cocaine addiction, which involves Long Access (LgA) self-administration procedures, is reported to produce tolerance to cocaine’s psychomotor activating effects and effects on DA activity. This is cited as evidence in support of the view that in addiction, drug-seeking and-taking is motivated to overcome this DA deficiency and associated anhedonia. In contrast, Intermittent Access (IntA) cocaine self-administration is more effective than LgA in producing addiction-like behavior, but sensitizes DA neurotransmission. There is, however, very little information concerning the effects of IntA experience on the psychomotor activating effects of cocaine. The purpose of the studies reported here, therefore, was to determine whether IntA experience produces psychomotor sensitization with similar characteristics to that produced by the intermittent, noncontingent administration of cocaine. It did. The psychomotor sensitization produced by IntA experience with cocaine: (1) was greater after a long (30 days) vs short (1 day) period of withdrawal; (2) was greater in females than males; and (3) resulted in cross-sensitization to another psychomotor stimulant drug, amphetamine. This pattern of cocaine experience-dependent plasticity favors an incentive-sensitization view of addiction.