Multicenter analysis of atrioesophageal fistula rates before and after adoption of active esophageal cooling during atrial fibrillation ablation
Author:
Sanchez JavierORCID, Woods Christopher, Zagrodzky Jason, Nazari Jose, Singleton MatthewORCID, Schricker AmirORCID, Ruppert Annie, Brumback Babette, Jenny Benjamin, Athill Charles, Joseph ChristopherORCID, Shah Dipak, Upadhyay Gaurav, Kulstad ErikORCID, Cogan John, Leyton-Mange Jordan, Cooper Julie, Tamirisa KamalaORCID, Omotoye Samuel, Timilsina Saroj, Perez-Verdia Alejandro, Kaplan Andrew, Patel ApoorORCID, Ro Alex, Corsello Andrew, Kolli Arun, Greet Brian, Willms Danya, Burkland David, Castillo Demetrio, Zahwe Firas, Nayak Hemal, Daniels James, MacGregor John, Sackett Matthew, Kutayli Michael, Barakat Michel, Percell Robert, Akrivakis Spyridon, Hao Steven C., Liu Taylor, Panico AmbroseORCID, Ramireddy Archana, Lanes Daniel Benhayon, Sze Edward, Francisco Greg, Silva Jose, McHugh Julia, Sung Kai, Feldman Leon, Serafini Nicholas, Kawasaki Raymond, Hongo Richard, Kuk RichardORCID, Hayward Robert, Park Shirley, Vu Andrew, Henry Christopher, Bailey Shane, Mickelsen Steven, Taneja Taresh, Fisher Westby, Metzl MarkORCID
Abstract
ABSTRACTBackgroundActive esophageal cooling reduces the incidence of endoscopically identified severe esophageal lesions during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the left atrium for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. No atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) has been reported to date with active esophageal cooling, and only one pericardio-esophageal fistula has been reported; however, a formal analysis of the AEF rate with active esophageal cooling has not previously been performed.MethodsAtrial fibrillation ablation procedure volumes before and after adoption of active cooling using a dedicated esophageal cooling device (ensoETM, Attune Medical) were determined across 25 hospital systems with the highest total use of esophageal cooling during RF ablation. The number of AEFs occurring in equivalent time frames before and after adoption of cooling were then determined, and AEF rates were compared using generalized estimating equations robust to cluster correlation.ResultsThroughout the 25 hospital systems, which included a total of 30 separate hospitals, 14,224 patients received active esophageal cooling during RF ablation, with the earliest adoption beginning in March 2019 and the most recent beginning in March 2022. In the time frames prior to adoption of active cooling, a total of 10,962 patients received primarily luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during their RF ablations. In this pre-adoption cohort a total of 16 AEFs occurred, for an AEF rate of 0.146%, in line with other published estimates of <0.1% to 0.25%. No AEFs were found in the cohort treated after adoption of active esophageal cooling, yielding an AEF rate of 0% (P<0.0001).ConclusionAdoption of active esophageal cooling during RF ablation of the left atrium for the treatment of atrial fibrillation was associated with a significant reduction in AEF rate.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|