Left bundle branch pacing with and without anodal capture: impact on ventricular activation pattern and acute hemodynamics

Author:

Ali Nadine,Saqi Khulat,Arnold Ahran D.ORCID,A.Miyazawa Alejandra,Keene Daniel,Chow Ji-Jian,Little Ian,Peters Nicholas S.ORCID,Kanagaratnam PrapaORCID,Qureshi Norman,Ng Fu SiongORCID,Linton Nick W. FORCID,Lefroy David C.,Francis Darrel P.ORCID,Lim PB,Tanner Mark A.ORCID,Muthumala Amal,Shun-Shin Matthew J.ORCID,Cole Graham D.,Whinnett Zachary I.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) can deliver physiological left ventricular activation, but typically at the cost of delayed right ventricular (RV) activation. A proposed solution is to advance RV activation through anodal capture, but there is uncertainty regarding the mechanism by which early RV activation is achieved (capture of right bundle or RV myocardial capture) and it is not known whether this produces hemodynamic benefit.MethodsWe recruited patients with LBBP leads in whom anodal capture eliminated the terminal R wave in lead V1.Ventricular activation pattern, timing and high precision acute hemodynamic response were studied during LBBP with and without anodal capture.ResultsWe recruited 21 patients, mean age 67 years, 14 were males. We measured ECG timings and hemodynamics in all patients and in 15 we also performed non-invasive mapping. Ventricular epicardial propagation maps demonstrated that right ventricular septal myocardial capture, rather than right bundle capture, was the mechanism for earlier RV activation. With anodal capture, QRS duration was shorter (116 ± 12ms versus 129 ± 14ms, p < 0.01), and total ventricular activation time was shorter (83 ± 18ms versus 90 ± 15ms, p = 0.01). This required higher outputs (3.6 ± 1.9V versus 0.6 ± 0.2V, p <0.01) but did not provide additional hemodynamic benefit (mean difference −0.2 ± 3.8 mmHg compared to pacing without anodal capture, p = 0.2).ConclusionLeft bundle pacing with anodal capture advances right ventricular activation as a result of stimulation of the RV septal myocardium. However, this requires higher outputs and did not improve acute hemodynamics. Aiming for anodal capture may therefore not be necessary.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3