A Gold Standard for Transcription Factor Regulatory Interactions inEscherichia coliK-12: Architecture of Evidence Types

Author:

Lara PalomaORCID,Gama-Castro SocorroORCID,Salgado HeladiaORCID,Rioualen ClaireORCID,Tierrafría Víctor H.ORCID,Muñiz-Rascado Luis J.,Bonavides-Martínez César,Collado-Vides JulioORCID

Abstract

AbstractPost-genomic implementations have expanded the experimental strategies to identify elements involved in the regulation of transcription initiation. As new methodologies emerge, a natural step is to compare their results with those from established methodologies, such as the classic methods of molecular biology used to characterize transcription factor binding sites, promoters, or transcription units.In the case ofEscherichia coliK-12, the best-studied microorganism, for the last 30 years we have continuously gathered such knowledge from original scientific publications, and have organized it in two databases, RegulonDB and EcoCyc. Furthermore, since RegulonDB version 11.0 (1), we offer comprehensive datasets of binding sites from chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with sequencing (ChIP-seq), ChIP combined with exonuclease digestion and next-generation sequencing (ChIP-exo), genomic SELEX screening (gSELEX), and DNA affinity purification sequencing (DAP-seq) HT technologies, as well as additional datasets for transcription start sites, transcription units and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) expression profiles.Here, we present for the first time an analysis of the sources of knowledge supporting the collection of transcriptional regulatory interactions (RIs) ofE. coliK-12. An RI is formed by the transcription factor, its positive or negative effect on a promoter, a gene or transcription unit. We improved the evidence codes so that the specific methods are described, and we classified them into seven independent groups. This is the basis for our updated computation of confidence levels, weak, strong, or confirmed, for the collection of RIs. We compare the confidence levels of the RI collection before and after adding HT evidence illustrating how knowledge will change as more HT data and methods appear in the future. Users can generate subsets filtering out the method they want to benchmark and avoid circularity, or keep for instance only the confirmed interactions.The comparison of different HT methods with the available datasets indicate that ChIP-seq recovers the highest fraction (>70%) of binding sites present in RegulonDB followed by gSELEX, DAP-seq and ChIP-exo. There is no other genomic database that offers this comprehensive high-quality anatomy of evidence supporting a corpus of transcriptional regulatory interactions.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3