A Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning-based Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder across Modalities

Author:

Winter Nils R.ORCID,Blanke Julian,Leenings Ramona,Ernsting Jan,Fisch Lukas,Sarink Kelvin,Barkhau Carlotta,Thiel Katharina,Flinkenflügel Kira,Winter Alexandra,Goltermann Janik,Meinert Susanne,Dohm Katharina,Repple Jonathan,Gruber Marius,Leehr Elisabeth J.,Opel Nils,Grotegerd Dominik,Redlich Ronny,Nitsch Robert,Bauer Jochen,Heindel Walter,Groß Joachim,Andlauer Till F. M.ORCID,Forstner Andreas J.,Nöthen Markus M.ORCID,Rietschel Marcella,Hofmann Stefan G.,Pfarr Julia-Katharina,Teutenberg Lea,Usemann Paula,Thomas-Odenthal Florian,Wroblewski Adrian,Brosch Katharina,Stein Frederike,Jansen Andreas,Jamalabadi Hamidreza,Alexander Nina,Straube Benjamin,Nenadić Igor,Kircher Tilo,Dannlowski Udo,Hahn Tim

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBiological psychiatry aims to understand mental disorders in terms of altered neurobiological pathways. However, for one of the most prevalent and disabling mental disorders, Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), patients only marginally differ from healthy individuals on the group-level. Whether Precision Psychiatry can solve this discrepancy and provide specific, reliable biomarkers remains unclear as current Machine Learning (ML) studies suffer from shortcomings pertaining to methods and data, which lead to substantial over-as well as underestimation of true model accuracy.MethodsAddressing these issues, we quantify classification accuracy on a single-subject level in N=1,801 patients with MDD and healthy controls employing an extensive multivariate approach across a comprehensive range of neuroimaging modalities in a well-curated cohort, including structural and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging as well as a polygenic risk score for depression.FindingsTraining and testing a total of 2.4 million ML models, we find accuracies for diagnostic classification between 48.1% and 62.0%. Multimodal data integration of all neuroimaging modalities does not improve model performance. Similarly, training ML models on individuals stratified based on age, sex, or remission status does not lead to better classification. Even under simulated conditions of perfect reliability, performance does not substantially improve. Importantly, model error analysis identifies symptom severity as one potential target for MDD subgroup identification.InterpretationAlthough multivariate neuroimaging markers increase predictive power compared to univariate analyses, single-subject classification – even under conditions of extensive, best-practice Machine Learning optimization in a large, harmonized sample of patients diagnosed using state-of-the-art clinical assessments – does not reach clinically relevant performance. Based on this evidence, we sketch a course of action for Precision Psychiatry and future MDD biomarker research.FundingThe German Research Foundation, and the Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research of the University of Münster.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3