GBAin Parkinson’s disease: variant detection and pathogenicity scoring matters

Author:

Gabbert CarolinORCID,Schaake Susen,Lüth Theresa,Much Christoph,Klein Christine,Aasly Jan O.,Farrer Matthew J.,Trinh Joanne

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundGBAvariants are the strongest genetic risk factor for Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the pathogenicity ofGBAvariants concerning PD is still not fully understood. Additionally, the frequency ofGBAvariants varies widely across populations.ObjectivesTo evaluate Oxford Nanopore sequencing as a strategy, to determine the frequency ofGBAvariants in Norwegian PD patients and controls, and to review the current literature on newly identified variants that add to pathogenicity determination.MethodsWe included 462 Norwegian PD patients and 367 healthy controls. We sequenced the full-lengthGBAgene on the Oxford Nanopore GridION as an 8.9 kb amplicon. Six analysis pipelines were compared using two aligners (NGMLR, Minimap2) and three variant callers (BCFtools, Clair3, Pepper-Margin-Deepvariant). Confirmation ofGBAvariants was performed by Sanger sequencing and the pathogenicity of variants was evaluated.ResultsWe found 95.8% (115/120) true-positiveGBAvariant calls, while 4.2% (5/120) variant calls were false-positive, with the NGMLR/Minimap2-BCFtools pipeline performing best. In total, 13 rareGBAvariants were detected: two were predicted to be (likely) pathogenic and eleven were of uncertain significance. The odds of carrying one of the two most commonGBAvariants, p.L483P or p.N409S, in PD patients were estimated to be 4.11 times the odds of carrying one of these variants in controls (OR=4.11 [1.39, 12.12]).ConclusionsIn conclusion, we have demonstrated that Oxford long-read Nanopore sequencing, along with the NGMLR/Minimap2-BCFtools pipeline is an effective tool to investigateGBAvariants. Further studies on the pathogenicity ofGBAvariants are needed to assess their effect on PD.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3