A tumor focused approach to resolving the etiology of DNA mismatch repair deficient tumors classified as suspected Lynch syndrome
Author:
Walker RomyORCID, Mahmood Khalid, Joo Jihoon E., Clendenning MarkORCID, Georgeson PeterORCID, Como Julia, Joseland Sharelle, Preston Susan G., Antill YolandORCID, Austin RachelORCID, Boussioutas Alex, Bowman Michelle, Burke Jo, Campbell AinsleyORCID, Daneshvar Simin, Edwards Emma, Gleeson Margaret, Goodwin AnnabelORCID, Harris Marion T., Henderson AlexORCID, Higgins MeganORCID, Hopper John L.ORCID, Hutchinson Ryan A., Ip EmiliaORCID, Isbister Joanne, Kasem Kais, Marfan Helen, Milnes DiORCID, Ng Annabelle, Nichols Cassandra, O’Connell Shona, Pachter Nicholas, Pope Bernard J.ORCID, Poplawski Nicola, Ragunathan Abiramy, Smyth Courtney, Spigelman Allan, Storey KirstyORCID, Susman RachelORCID, Taylor Jessica A., Warwick LindaORCID, Wilding MathildaORCID, Williams Rachel, Win Aung K., Walsh Michael D.ORCID, Macrae Finlay A.ORCID, Jenkins Mark A., Rosty ChristopheORCID, Winship Ingrid M., Buchanan Daniel D.,
Abstract
AbstractRoutine screening of tumors for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (dMMR) in colorectal (CRC), endometrial (EC) and sebaceous skin (SST) tumors leads to a significant proportion of unresolved cases classified as suspected Lynch syndrome (SLS). SLS cases (n=135) were recruited from Family Cancer Clinics across Australia and New Zealand. Targeted panel sequencing was performed on tumor (n=137; 80xCRCs, 33xECs and 24xSSTs) and matched blood-derived DNA to assess for microsatellite instability status, tumor mutation burden, COSMIC tumor mutational signatures and to identify germline and somatic MMR gene variants. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) andMLH1promoter methylation were repeated. In total, 86.9% of the 137 SLS tumors could be resolved into established subtypes. For 22.6% of these resolved SLS cases, primaryMLH1epimutations (2.2%) as well as previously undetected germline MMR pathogenic variants (1.5%), tumorMLH1methylation (13.1%) or false positive dMMR IHC (5.8%) results were identified. Double somatic MMR gene mutations were the major cause of dMMR identified across each tumor type (73.9% of resolved cases, 64.2% overall, 70% of CRC, 45.5% of ECs and 70.8% of SSTs). The unresolved SLS tumors (13.1%) comprised tumors with only a single somatic (7.3%) or no somatic (5.8%) MMR gene mutations. A tumor-focused testing approach reclassified 86.9% of SLS into Lynch syndrome, sporadic dMMR or MMR-proficient cases. These findings support the incorporation of tumor sequencing and alternateMLH1methylation assays into clinical diagnostics to reduce the number of SLS patients and provide more appropriate surveillance and screening recommendations.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference49 articles.
1. Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives;EGAPP;Genetics in Medicine. Elsevier,2009 2. Clinical problems of colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer cases with unknown cause of tumor mismatch repair deficiency (suspected Lynch syndrome);Appl Clin Genet,2014 3. den Elzen N , Joseland SL , Saya S , Jonnagadla S , Isbister J , Winship I , et al. “Left in limbo”: Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice. 2021;19:43. 4. Jonnagadla S , Joseland SL , Saya S , den Elzen N , Isbister J , Winship IM , et al. Heterogeneity in the psychosocial and behavioral responses associated with a diagnosis of suspected Lynch syndrome in women with endometrial cancer. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022;20:27. 5. Efficacy of paired tumor and germline testing in evaluation of patients with Lynch-like syndrome in a large integrated healthcare setting;Fam Cancer,2021
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|