Hemodynamics in Patients with Aortic Coarctation: A Comparison ofin vivo4D-Flow MRI and FSI Simulation

Author:

Nair Priya J.ORCID,Pfaller Martin R.,Dual Seraina A.,Loecher Michael,McElhinney Doff B.,Ennis Daniel B.,Marsden Alison L.

Abstract

AbstractThe analysis of quantitative hemodynamics provides information for the diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with aortic coarctation (CoA). Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations reveal detailed hemodynamic information, but their agreement with the clinical standard 4D-Flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) needs to be characterized. This work directly comparesin vivoCFD fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations against 4D-Flow MRI in patients with CoA (N=5). 4D-Flow MRI-derived flow waveforms and cuff blood pressure measurements were used to tune the boundary conditions for the FSI simulations. Flow rates from 4D-Flow MRI and FSI were compared at cross-sections in the ascending aorta (AAo), CoA and descending aorta (DAo). Qualitative comparisons showed an overall agreement of flow patterns in the aorta between the two methods. TheR2values for the flow waveforms in the AAo, CoA, and DAo were 0.97, 0.84 and 0.81 respectively, representing a strong correlation between 4DFlow MRI measurements and FSI results. This work characterizes the use of patient-specific FSI simulations in quantifying and analyzing CoA hemodynamics to inform CoA treatment planning.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3