Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines against Omicron Infection and Severe Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Test-Negative Design Studies

Author:

Song ShangchenORCID,Madewell Zachary J.ORCID,Liu Mingjin,Longini Ira M.ORCID,Yang Yang

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEvaluating vaccine effectiveness (VE) of a full vaccine series and booster doses against COVID-19 is important for health decision-making.MethodsWe systematically searched papers that evaluated VE of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Embase, Scopus, and preprint servers (bioRxiv and medRxiv) published from November 26th, 2021 to June 27th, 2022 (for full doses and first booster), and to January 8th, 2023 (for the second booster). The pooled VE against Omicron-associated symptomatic or any infection as well as severe events are estimated in a meta-analysis framework.ResultsFrom 2,552 citations identified, a total of 42 were included. The vaccination of the first booster provided stronger protection against Omicron than the full doses alone, shown by the VE estimates of 53.1% (95% CI: 48.0−57.8) vs. 28.6% (95% CI: 18.5−37.4) against infection and 82.5% (95% CI: 77.8−86.2) vs. 57.3% (95% CI: 48.5−64.7) against severe disease. The second booster offered strong protection among adults within 60 days of vaccination against infection (VE=53.1%, 95% CI: 48.0−57.8) and severe disease (VE=87.3% (95% CI: 75.5-93.4), comparable to the first booster with corresponding VE estimates of 59.9% against infection and 84.8% against severe disease. The VEs of the booster doses against severe disease among adults sustained beyond 60 days, 77.6% (95% CI: 69.4−83.6) for the first and 85.9% (95% CI: 80.3−89.9) for the second booster. The VE against infection was less sustainable regardless of dose type. Pure mRNA vaccines provided comparable protection to partial mRNA vaccines, but both provided higher protection than non-mRNA vaccination.ConclusionOne or two booster doses of current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines provide considerable protection against Omicron infection and substantial and sustainable protection against Omicron-induced severe clinical outcomes.FundingUS CDC U01 CK000670

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference66 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants. 2022. https://www.who.int/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants.

2. The emergence and epidemic characteristics of the highly mutated SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant;J Med Virol,2022

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Monitoring Variant Proportions. 2022. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions.

4. The effective reproductive number of the Omicron variant of SARS -CoV-2 is several times relative to Delta;Journal of Travel Medicine,2022

5. Replication of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA. 2 variant in ex vivo cultures of the human upper and lower respiratory tract;EBioMedicine,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3