Author:
Xia Kai,Fu Zheng,Hou Lei,Han Jing-Dong J.
Abstract
It has been a puzzle that genome or proteome sizes are not correlated with the complexity of the organisms. Although alternative splicing and noncoding and regulatory elements explain some of the differences, the complexity of the protein interaction network and regulatory network may provide additional explanations. Here, we collected 642 domains that mediate protein–protein interactions (PPIs) and examined the evolution of the PPI domains and its impact on organismal complexity and PPI network complexity. In agreement with previous more general studies of protein domains, a significant expansion of PPI domains per proteome was found in metazoa. We also found both the number and coverage of PPI domains per protein increased. However, a better correlation with complexity was seen with increasing PPI domain coverage per protein, so that proteins in complex organisms are more compact and specialized in PPI. Such a structural adaptation of the proteins is correlated with the number of interactions that the proteins can make in PPI networks, and seems to be a more favorable way to increase network connectivity than other structural adaptations.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Subject
Genetics(clinical),Genetics
Reference22 articles.
1. David, L. Nelson, M.M.C. (2005) Lehninger principles of biochemistry, The three-dimensional structure of proteins (W.H. Freeman & Co, New York), 4th ed. pp 116–156.
2. Flexible nets. The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks
3. Futuyma, D.J. (2005) Evolution (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA), pp 458–459.
4. What is a gene, post-ENCODE? History and updated definition
5. Alternative splicing: increasing diversity in the proteomic world
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献