Abstract
The construction industry is dynamic in nature because it involves a wide number of stakeholders, such as consumers, manufacturers, consultants, regulators and others. Construction projects suffer from many challenges and complex performance issues, such as low coordination, job delays, changes in goals. Study on the contrast of conventional and modern methodologies for project management in construction projects. Introduction of Agile project management approach as modern project management methodology and its framework effects on construction project performance. With the use of Agile software development tools comparison of individuals experts and team solutions will be analyzed and evaluate optimum solutions and their comparison with traditional project management tools. In traditional project management, validation of the results has been done through survey of the experienced experts. However, as agile software development tools Jira and Trello software would be used for managing project. Analysis of the research will compare traditional and agile project management tools and suggest the project management team an optimum solution of any problem occur at construction project.
Publisher
Granthaalayah Publications and Printers
Reference34 articles.
1. (2021). India GDP From Construction. Tranding Economics.
2. Ahmed, M. N., & Mohammed, S. R. (2018). Agile Quality Management Framework in Construction Projects (AQMFCP). International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(20), 307-309.
3. Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Spadinger, M., Reiss, N., Breitschuh, J., Richter, T., ... & Marthaler, F. (2019). A systematic approach to situation-adequate mechatronic system development by ASD-Agile Systems Design. Procedia CIRP, 84, 1015-1022.
4. Ambler, S. W., & Lines, M. (2012). Disciplined agile delivery: A practitioner's guide to agile software delivery in the enterprise. IBM press.
5. Bashford, H. H., Walsh, K. D., & Sawhney, A. (2005). Production system loading–cycle time relationship in residential construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(1), 15-22.