Author:
Ramola Sheeba,Rangnekar Santosh
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to explore an integrated relationship between performance appraisal, succession planning, and career development in the Indian context. A very few empirical studies could be seen in identifying a relationship between the proposed variables.
Design/methodology/approach: An empirical study was conducted by employing the cross-sectional survey-based research design along with the convenience sampling method. Around, 167 questionnaires were circulated through online via Google forms. Finally, 134 responses were received from respondents having 80.23% response rate. The responses were subject to analysis using normality check, confirmatory factor analysis, correlation, model fit and multiple hierarchical regression analysis.
Findings: Results reveal that all three study variables are positively associated with each other. This study fully supports the applicability of performance appraisal, and succession planning as crucial predictors of career development more specifically in the Indian context.
Research limitations/implications: This current study is conducted using online data collection procedure, while future studies may use in-depth interview and daily diary studies.
Practical implications: This study exhibits how employee career development can be initiated through succession planning and performance appraisal. This study also suggested that the organizations which emphasize on an effective policy guideline for systematic performance appraisal will probably support the succession planning and career development.
Originality/value: Notably, no prior studies empirically investigate the proposed relationship in Indian context. Furthermore, the findings serve as a policy guideline for the performance appraisal, succession planning and career development literature in an Indian organizational setting.
Publisher
Granthaalayah Publications and Printers
Reference28 articles.
1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
2. Arvey, R. D., & Murphy, K. R. (1998). Performance evaluation in work settings. Annual review of psychology, 49(1), 141-168.
3. Beechler, S., & Woodward, I. C. (2009). The global “war for talent”. Journal of international management, 15(3), 273-285.
4. Conway, J. M. (1999). Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of applied Psychology, 84(1), 3.
5. Collins, J. C., & Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap... and others don't. Random House.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献