Author:
Bansal Kanika,Chhabra Pankaj
Abstract
India is bestowed with rich cultural diversity manifested by a wide range of tangible heritage resources. The formal inception of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) during colonial rule paved way for heritage conservation protecting the National Monuments pan India that are less than 0.01% of the total existing heritage resources. Though the State Archaeology Department and the National Monuments Authority have taken various initiatives at the state levels, the adopted conservation process lacks an integrated approach due to the involvement of a wide array of stakeholders ranging from the Central Government to the local authorities to the various conservation groups. Each of these agencies employs vivid funding sources and mechanisms and variable sets of guidelines and norms with diversity in delivery models for various heritage conservation projects limiting the conservation process to piecemeals. Shimla, a colonial hill town in the north of India, and the state capital of Himachal Pradesh is home to vast stock of tangible and intangible heritage resources. Amidst rapid growth and urbanization, over the past two decades, several initiatives have been taken by the state government of Himachal Pradesh (GoHP) in resonance with the urban local bodies of Shimla but only a few of the conservation projects have seen success. However, the findings of the research bring out that though the GoHP has been proactive in protecting its heritage resources, however, a large part of the heritage resources in Shimla remain in a state of neglect and lack maintenance and management. This is because of the complexity involved in the conception and implementation of heritage conservation because of the vastness of heritage resources and the involvement of diverse groups of stakeholders in the process, as the role of urban local bodies directly impacts the efficiency of the conservation program. The study brings out the heritage conservation process adopted in Shimla by various government agencies.
Publisher
Granthaalayah Publications and Printers
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference20 articles.
1. Aayog, N. (2020). Working Group Report on Improving Heritage Management in India. Government of India.
2. Aiken, S. R. (1994). Imperial Belvederes : The Hill Stations of Malaya. Oxford University Press.
3. Archaeological Survey of India. (2022). World Heritage Sites.
4. Baker, K. (2010). The Changing Tourist Gaze in India's Hill Stations : Vignettes from the Early 19th Century to the Present. CAB International, Tourism and Visual Culture, 1, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936099.0001.
5. Bansal, K., and Chabbra, P. (2019). Development of Empirical Hill Stations in India During the Colonial Regime. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Rediscovering Cities 2K20, 57-72.